These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. [STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF TURBINE NOISES IN DENTAL PRACTICE ON HEARING]. KELLER J; OLK E; OPITZ J Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1964 Nov; 43():680-90. PubMed ID: 14334529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [New data in the practice and theory of noise audiometry; distance masking and recruitment]. LANGENBECK B Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1951 Oct; 30(10):423-41. PubMed ID: 13079006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Audiometric data following exposure to low-frequency-centered noise. SCHOWALTER EJ AMA Arch Ind Hyg Occup Med; 1952 May; 5(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 14922977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Noise bands vs. pure tones as stimuli for audiometry. MYERS CK J Speech Hear Disord; 1957 Dec; 22(5):757-60. PubMed ID: 13492332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Masking in audiometry; with special reference to the non-thermal type of noise. PALVA T Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1954; 118():156-72. PubMed ID: 13228004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [ON THE EFFECT OF IMPULSE NOISE ON THE FUNCTIONAL STATUS OF THE ACOUSTIC ANALYZER UNDER EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS]. SUVOROV GA Tr Leningr Sanitarnogig Med Inst; 1964; 76():295-300. PubMed ID: 14299300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Audiometry in workers in factors with noisy conditions]. STEFANOVIC B; MILUTINOVIC S Med Glas; 1955; 9(2-3):98-101. PubMed ID: 13244104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of group audiometry]. LANSBERG MP Aeromed Acta; 1955; 4():151-6. PubMed ID: 13361983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of audiometry of noises (Langenbeck) and recruitment phenomenon test (Fowler)]. BRANDSTETTER L Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1953; 162(3):163-86. PubMed ID: 13081085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Noise and audiometric histories resulting from cotton textile operations. COX JR; MANSUR RH; WILLIAMS CR AMA Arch Ind Hyg Occup Med; 1953 Jul; 8(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 13057387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery. Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [ON CONSTRUCTION OF SOUNDPROOF CHAMBERS]. BORSHCHEVSKII IIa; KUZNETSOV VS Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1964; 26():25-9. PubMed ID: 14149497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing acuity and exposure to patrol aircraft noise. Pierson WR; Barron CI Aerosp Med; 1969 Oct; 40(10):1099-101. PubMed ID: 5348735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Residual effect of a stimulus with complex spectrum (white noise) on the auditory threshold of several fundamental frequencies]. Pirodda E; Cenacchi V; Segatta D Otorinolaringol Ital; 1968; 37(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 5719450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [On the prolonged action of permissable parameters of noise on the hearing of workers]. Maksimova LI; Kublanova PS; Maĭorov VP; Dmitrieva KA Gig Sanit; 1966 Feb; 31(2):11-6. PubMed ID: 5983418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]