These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13079019)

  • 21. [Directional hearing and understanding of speech in noise uith "normal hearing" people (author's transl)].
    Platte HJ; Döring WH; Schlöndorff G
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Jul; 57(7):672-80. PubMed ID: 682785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The value of directional audiometry in the assessment of the central components in noise induced hearing loss (author's transl)].
    Dieroff HG
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Sep; 52(9):681-6. PubMed ID: 4749146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Alteration of the masking sound level uring and after acoustic stimulation].
    Müller G
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1970; 195(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 5447139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. New industry anti-noise law requires hearing tests and sound controls.
    IMS Ind Med Surg; 1972 May; 41(5):34-5. PubMed ID: 4503276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Hearing damage caused by workplace noise among patients given audiometry tests in general practice].
    Company i Escales MA; Fabrega i Gorriz O
    Aten Primaria; 1991 Sep; 8(8):610-4. PubMed ID: 16986245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Stability of the effectiveness of critical hearing bands on altering the parameters of the masking noise].
    Pal'gov VI; Tereshchenko VM; Marchuk IV
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1972; (3):46-51. PubMed ID: 4680877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Nose and speech discrimination with specific hearing aid systems (author's transl)].
    Bernath O; Richartz W; Bormann B
    HNO; 1978 Feb; 26(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 632137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Noise from turbine drill. Risk for hearing injuries among dentists?].
    Hundseth T; Moe PO; Lund O
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1973 May; 83(5):185-7. PubMed ID: 4584362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The clinical evaluation of noise induced hearing loss.
    Jahrsdoerfer R
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):637-8. PubMed ID: 471509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The SISI test in occupational neurolabyrinth diseases. Results and clinical considerations].
    Babighian G
    Minerva Otorinolaringol; 1969; 19(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 5405147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Extended high frequency audiometry in the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss].
    Somma G; Coppeta L; Magrini A; Parrella M; Cappelletti MC; Gardi S; Messina M; Bergamaschi A;
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2007; 29(3 Suppl):258-60. PubMed ID: 18409674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Is it possible to determine presbycusis caused by noise?].
    Miyares Puente RL
    An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1976; 3(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 984348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A survey of hearing conservation programs in representative aerospace industries. I. Prevalence of programs and monitoring audiometry.
    Rintelmann WF; Gasaway DC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1967; 28(4):372-80. PubMed ID: 6049260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A randomised controlled trial of screening for adult hearing loss during preventive health checks.
    Karlsmose B; Lauritzen T; Engberg M; Parving A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 May; 51(466):351-5. PubMed ID: 11360697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Magnitude of temporary threshold shift (TTS) in the audiogram and "response time" of noise-or detonation exposed ears as test of hearing organs endangered by detonation].
    Pfander F
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1968; 191(2):586-90. PubMed ID: 5716743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Psychosomatic status affects the relationship between subjective hearing difficulties and the results of audiometry.
    Hashimoto H; Nomura K; Yano E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 15135839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Harmfulness of noise: methods of analysis and comparison].
    Saia B; Marcer G; Rigatti Luchini S
    Med Lav; 1975; 66(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 1134435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Smartphone hearing screening with integrated quality control and data management.
    Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Howe DM; Mahomed F; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):841-9. PubMed ID: 24998412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Noise-induced hearing loss, with special reference to the difference between hearing thresholds of the right and left ears].
    Takeuchi T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1973 Feb; 76(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 4738238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High-frequency audiometry: a means for early diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Mehrparvar AH; Mirmohammadi SJ; Ghoreyshi A; Mollasadeghi A; Loukzadeh Z
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(55):402-6. PubMed ID: 22122956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.