These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1308325)

  • 1. A chemomechanical system for caries removal and glass ionomer cement to restore fixed partial denture abutments.
    Lu DP
    Spec Care Dentist; 1992; 12(6):255-8. PubMed ID: 1308325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restoration of posterior teeth with proximal carious lesions.
    Morand JM; Jonas P
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 8602418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chemomechanical caries removal--a clinical evaluation.
    Zinck JH; McInnes-Ledoux P; Capdeboscq C; Weinberg R
    J Oral Rehabil; 1988 Jan; 15(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 3162257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental caries under glass ionomer restorations.
    van Amerongen WE
    J Public Health Dent; 1996; 56(3 Spec No):150-4; discussion 161-3. PubMed ID: 8915961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach.
    Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Barbosa SH; Lauris JR; Franco EB
    J Public Health Dent; 2003; 63(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 14682645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of caries removal by the partial tunnel preparation method.
    Strand GV; Tveit AB
    Scand J Dent Res; 1993 Oct; 101(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 8248727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial slot Class II restorations: a conservative technique revisited.
    Ewoldsen N
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Jan; 69(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 12556266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A
    Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of a chemomechanical method for caries removal in children and adolescents.
    Peric T; Markovic D; Petrovic B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 19452332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atraumatic restorative treatment: an alternative for pre-cooperative children.
    Chan T
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2007 Jan; 89(1):42, 44. PubMed ID: 17393893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of air abrasion and glass ionomer cements in microdentistry.
    Milicich G
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Nov; 22(11A):1026-30, 1032-4, 1036-9; quiz 1045. PubMed ID: 11915644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.
    Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 9870536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation-induced root surface caries restored with glass-ionomer cement placed in conventional and ART cavity preparations: results at two years.
    Hu JY; Chen XC; Li YQ; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Aust Dent J; 2005 Sep; 50(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 16238217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years.
    Mandari GJ; Truin GJ; van't Hof MA; Frencken JE
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 11275667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of high-strength glass ionomer: resin composite restorations in minimally invasive treatment.
    Platt JA; Rhodes B
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2001-2002 Winter; 80(4):20-2. PubMed ID: 12061017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reactor paper: minimal intervention techniques for dental caries.
    Ismail AI
    J Public Health Dent; 1996; 56(3 Spec No):155-60. PubMed ID: 8915962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microconservative restorations for approximal carious lesions.
    Hunt PR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 2404042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.