These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1308627)

  • 1. Interpreting the Delaney Clause in the 21st century.
    Picut CA; Parker GA
    Toxicol Pathol; 1992; 20(4):617-27, discussion 628-9. PubMed ID: 1308627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A regulatory relic: After 60 years of research on cancer risk, the Delaney Clause continues to keep us in the past.
    Krishan M; Navarro L; Beck B; Carvajal R; Dourson M
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2021 Dec; 433():115779. PubMed ID: 34737146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human protection against non-genotoxic carcinogens in the US without the Delaney Clause.
    Weisburger JH
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):201-8. PubMed ID: 8672878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How the 62-year old Delaney Clause continues to thwart science: Case study of the flavor substance β-myrcene.
    Felter SP; Llewelyn C; Navarro L; Zhang X
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Aug; 115():104708. PubMed ID: 32522581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulatory use of computational toxicology tools and databases at the United States Food and Drug Administration's Office of Food Additive Safety.
    Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan R; Muldoon-Jacobs K; Mayer J; Ogungbesan A
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 6(7):793-6. PubMed ID: 20491519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letter: The Delaney Clause.
    Prev Med; 1973 Dec; 2(4):608-10. PubMed ID: 4778467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk assessment of carcinogens in food with special consideration of non-genotoxic carcinogens. Scientific arguments for use of risk assessment and for changing the Delaney Clause specifically.
    Williams GM; Karbe E; Fenner-Crisp P; Iatropoulos MJ; Weisburger JH
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):209-15. PubMed ID: 8672879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific basis for interpretation of Delaney clause.
    Zimbelman RG
    J Anim Sci; 1979 Apr; 48(4):986-92. PubMed ID: 479028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Living with and reforming the Delaney Clause.
    Degnan FH; Flamm WG
    Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(2):235-56. PubMed ID: 10342993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 37 year history of the Delaney Clause.
    Weisburger JH
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):183-8. PubMed ID: 8672873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of transgenic mice in carcinogenicity hazard assessment.
    Jacobson-Kram D; Sistare FD; Jacobs AC
    Toxicol Pathol; 2004; 32 Suppl 1():49-52. PubMed ID: 15209403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current carcinogen perspectives: De minimis, Delaney and decisions.
    Weisburger EK
    Sci Total Environ; 1989 Oct; 86(1-2):5-13. PubMed ID: 2690341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Editorial: The Delaney Clause.
    Coon JM
    Prev Med; 1973 Mar; 2(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 4378415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regulatory aspects of carcinogenicity studies and the Delaney clause.
    Flamm WG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Feb; 21(1):71-4; discussion 81-6. PubMed ID: 7784638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Of rats and cancer testing.
    Foulger JH
    Del Med J; 1977 Jun; 49(6):364-6. PubMed ID: 872990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ED01 study: introduction, objectives, and experimental design.
    Cairns T
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1980; 3(3 Spec No):1-7. PubMed ID: 7365374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cyclamates: a review of the current position.
    Cook CE
    Curr Med Res Opin; 1975; 3(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 1097197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of the Delaney Clause at the FDA.
    Lorentzen RJ
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):198. PubMed ID: 8672876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Change the rules for food additives.
    Ashby J
    Nature; 1994 Apr; 368(6472):582. PubMed ID: 8145840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of 'secondary mechanism' in the regulation of carcinogens; a chronology.
    Scheuplein RJ
    Cancer Lett; 1995 Jun; 93(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 7600537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.