These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1310663)

  • 1. Long-term retrospective studies on the CT-scan, CAD/CAM, one-stage surgery hydroxyapatite-coated subperiosteal implants, including human functional retrievals.
    Benjamin LS
    Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 36(1):77-93; discussion 94-5. PubMed ID: 1310663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CAD-CAM multiplanar diagnostic imaging for subperiosteal implants.
    Golec TS
    Dent Clin North Am; 1986 Jan; 30(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 3456935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CAD/CAM subperiosteal implants in Australia. Case report.
    Fischer JE
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Aug; 38(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 8110228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Status of the hydroxyapatite-coated unilateral subperiosteal implant using direct bone impressions.
    Stobaugh RK
    Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 36(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 1310662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term retrospective studies on hydroxyapatite coated endosteal and subperiosteal implants.
    Golec TS; Krauser JT
    Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 36(1):39-65. PubMed ID: 1310661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Helical CT scanning for CAD/CAM subperiosteal implant construction.
    Stoler A
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(3-4):247-57. PubMed ID: 9524503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Placement of a modified subperiosteal implant: a clinical solution to help those with no bone.
    Nazarian A
    Dent Today; 2014 Jul; 33(7):134, 136-7. PubMed ID: 25118530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morphologic replication of the mandible using computerized tomography for the fabrication of a subperiosteal implant.
    Truitt HP; James RA; Lindley PE; Boyne P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):499-504. PubMed ID: 3287255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer tomography (CT) applications in implant dentistry.
    James RA; Lozada JL; Truitt HP
    J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 1942127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advances in subperiosteal implant reconstruction.
    Boyne PJ; James RA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1986 Apr; 30(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 3009243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate versus non-immediate implantation for full-arch fixed reconstruction following extraction of all residual teeth: a retrospective comparative study.
    Schwartz-Arad D; Gulayev N; Chaushu G
    J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):923-8. PubMed ID: 10914795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of CT generated model with its mandibular and maxillary bone; 2: In vivo study utilizing rasterstereographic technique.
    Harris DD; Ismail YH; Misch C; Zaki HS
    Int J Oral Implantol; 1989; 6(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2519534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hydroxyapatite-coated subperiosteal dental implants: design rationale and clinical experience.
    Kay JF; Golec TS; Riley RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Sep; 58(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 3040971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The restorative and surgical technique for the full maxillary subperiosteal implant.
    Homoly PA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Sep; 121(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 2212328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Customised instrument to retract alveolar subperiosteal flap during the placement of dental implants: new technique.
    Vadepally AK
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 55(8):855-856. PubMed ID: 28844571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Problems associated with the atrophic mandible.
    Worthington P; Rubenstein JE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):129-60. PubMed ID: 9421674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of the possibility to treat the edentulous maxilla with osseointegrated implants.
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Carlsson LE
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 1579883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Virtual variation simulation of CAD/CAM template-guided surgeries performed on human cadavers: Part II.
    Kero T; Pettersson A; Fäldt J; Andersson M; Gillot L; Cannas B; Näsström K; Söderberg R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jul; 104(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 20620367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of laser technology (Er;Cr:YSGG) and stereolithography to aid in the placement of a subperiosteal implant: case study.
    Kusek ER
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 19288882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.