These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1311890)

  • 1. Fungal fruiting heads in Papanicolaou smears as evidence of spatula contamination.
    Rupp M; McCullough L; Buchen D
    Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(2):269-70. PubMed ID: 1311890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Fruiting body" Penicillium species: Papanicolaou stained conventional cervical smear findings.
    Donta B; Naik DD; Mali BN; Bandiwadekar A; Ramnath K; Rao M
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Jan; 38(1):34-5. PubMed ID: 19217051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM; Blythe JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of cotton-tipped applicators for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix for Papanicolaou smears.
    Shen JT; Nalick RH; Schlaerth JB; Morrow CP
    Acta Cytol; 1984; 28(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 6592916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aspergillus/Penicillium sp. spores as a contaminant on conventional Pap smear.
    Martínez-Girón R; Fernández-García C
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Dec; 37(12):899-900. PubMed ID: 19217038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The efficacy of an endocervical brush in obtaining adequate Papanicolaou smears.
    Grossman MB; Clofine R
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 Sep; 91(9):875-9. PubMed ID: 1757278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unusual microbial organisms seen in two cervical smears.
    Brimo F; Ouad L; Brodeur J; Charbonneau M; Auger M
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Nov; 37(11):836-8. PubMed ID: 19526575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush.
    Maeda MY; Longatto Filho A; Santos DR; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS; De Andrea Filho A
    Pathologica; 1991; 83(1083):105-9. PubMed ID: 1714070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
    Taylor PT; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Covell JL; Smith EB; Underwood PB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T; Knight AL; Elswick RK
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A continuous quality improvement project to improve the quality of cervical Papanicolaou smears.
    Burkman RT; Ward R; Balchandani K; Kini S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):470-5. PubMed ID: 8058251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD; Hernandez E; Dunton CJ
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of vaginal specula in improving infection control.
    Tattersall S
    Nurs Times; 2006 Feb 28-Mar 6; 102(9):53-5. PubMed ID: 16539325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
    Tyau L; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Edmonds P
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.