These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Dynamic sequential MR imaging of focal liver lesions: initial experience in 22 patients at 1.5 T. Schmiedl U; Kölbel G; Hess CF; Klose U; Kurtz B J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 2164538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The dynamic magnetic resonance study of focal liver lesions by FLASH sequences with bolus intravenous gadolinium-DTPA]. Olivetti L; Grazioli L; Maroldi R; Matricardi L; Milanesio L Radiol Med; 1992 Apr; 83(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1318558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Basic analysis of dynamic study in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma using inversion recovery snap shot FLASH MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Suto Y; Kamba M; Kato T; Ohta Y Radiat Med; 1995; 13(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 7667515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancement characteristics of liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas with Gd-EOB-DTPA: preliminary results with dynamic MR imaging. Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Daldrup HE; Hesse T; Balzer T; Tombach B; Peters PE Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 9038130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features of hepatic hemangioma compared with enhanced computed tomography. Tateyama A; Fukukura Y; Takumi K; Shindo T; Kumagae Y; Kamimura K; Nakajo M World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Nov; 18(43):6269-76. PubMed ID: 23180948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Small hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with dynamic FLASH MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Yoshida H; Itai Y; Ohtomo K; Kokubo T; Minami M; Yashiro N Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 2539606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Vogl TJ; Kümmel S; Hammerstingl R; Schellenbeck M; Schumacher G; Balzer T; Schwarz W; Müller PK; Bechstein WO; Mack MG; Söllner O; Felix R Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 8657946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation of hepatic hemangiomas from metastases by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Hamm B; Fischer E; Taupitz M J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(2):205-16. PubMed ID: 2312848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic spin-echo imaging with Gd-DTPA: value in the differentiation of hepatic tumors. Van Beers B; Demeure R; Pringot J; Defalque D; Geubel A; Gigot JF; Jamart J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Mar; 154(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 2154913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of viable tumor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with iodized oil. Pathologic correlation with dynamic turbo-FLASH MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Murakami T; Nakamura H; Hori S; Tomoda K; Mitani T; Nakanishi K; Hashimoto T; Tsuda K; Kozuka T; Monden M Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 8391291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Differentiation between hepatoma and hemangioma by inversion recovery snapshot FLASH MR imaging with variable TIs]. Tsuda K; Murakami T; Nakanishi K; Nakamura H; Hori S; Tomoda K; Mitani T; Hashimoto T; Maeshima S; Kozuka T Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Jun; 52(6):838-40. PubMed ID: 1322525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hepatic hemangiomas: difference in enhancement pattern on 3T MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadoxetate disodium. Gupta RT; Marin D; Boll DT; Husarik DB; Davis DE; Feuerlein S; Merkle EM Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2457-62. PubMed ID: 22138122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic Gd-enhanced MR imaging of hepatic hemangioma: is high temporal resolution requisite for characterization? Urhahn R; Kilbinger M; Drobnitzky M; Mans-Peine G; Neuerburg J; Günther RW Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 14(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 8656988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of focal hepatic masses by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: findings in 311 lesions. Quillin SP; Atilla S; Brown JJ; Borrello JA; Yu CY; Pilgram TK Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 9201674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging: value of hepatobiliary phase for the detection of focal liver lesions. Fu GL; Du Y; Zee CS; Yang HF; Li Y; Duan RG; Zeng NL; Xiao DM J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 22261765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR differentiation of hepatic haemangioma and hepatocellular carcinoma: value of delayed-phase Gd-DTPA enhanced images. Okada Y; Itai Y; Ohtomo K; Kokubo T; Yoshida H; Sasaki Y Rofo; 1991 Jun; 154(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 1648765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early homogeneously enhancing hemangioma versus hepatocellular carcinoma: differentiation using quantitative analysis of multiphasic dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Jeong MG; Yu JS; Kim KW; Jo BJ; Kim JK Yonsei Med J; 1999 Jun; 40(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 10412337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]