These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13129895)

  • 1. Corneal refractive power after myopic LASIK.
    Probst LE; Holladay JT
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Sep; 110(9):1857; author reply 1857-8. PubMed ID: 13129895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal refractive power after myopic LASIK.
    Feiz V; Mannis MJ
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Sep; 110(9):1855-6; author reply 1856-7. PubMed ID: 13129891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Topographic and biomechanical differences between hyperopic and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Qazi MA; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 15721696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consideration of the posterior corneal curvature for assessment of corneal power after myopic LASIK.
    Langenbucher A; Torres F; Behrens A; Suarez E; Haigis W; Seitz B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):264-9. PubMed ID: 15115446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size of corneal topographic effective optical zone: comparison of standard and customized myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Racine L; Wang L; Koch DD
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 16876501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: Estimating the corneal refractive power.
    Awwad ST; Manasseh C; Bowman RW; Cavanagh HD; Verity S; Mootha V; McCulley JP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1070-6. PubMed ID: 18571071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis of the dynamic changes of cornea after myopic excimer laser in situ keratomileusis using an Orbscan II topography system].
    Wu XY; Liu SZ; Hu SF; Li CL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 42(9):777-81. PubMed ID: 17173736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A direct method to measure the power of the central cornea after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Sónego-Krone S; López-Moreno G; Beaujon-Balbi OV; Arce CG; Schor P; Campos M
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 122(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 14769590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correcting the corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculations after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Cheng AC; Lam DS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):970; author reply 970. PubMed ID: 15126181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlations between central and peripheral changes in anterior corneal topography after myopic LASIK and their implications in postsurgical contact lens fitting.
    González-Méijome JM; Sañudo-Buitrago F; López-Alemany A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Jul; 32(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 16845266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Chen MC; Lee N; Bourla N; Hamilton DR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1886-91. PubMed ID: 19006734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response of the posterior corneal surface to laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
    Twa MD; Roberts C; Mahmoud AM; Chang JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 15721697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining corneal power using Orbscan II videokeratography for IOL calculation after excimer laser surgery for myopia.
    Arce CG; Campos M; Schor P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1348-9; author reply 1349-50. PubMed ID: 17662405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Formula for determining corneal refractive power.
    Maloney RK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):211-2; author reply 212. PubMed ID: 19185220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pentacam equivalent K-reading.
    Savini G; Hoffer KJ
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 26(6):388-9; author reply 389-91. PubMed ID: 20677725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to -10 diopters.
    Alió JL; Muftuoglu O; Ortiz D; Pérez-Santonja JJ; Artola A; Ayala MJ; Garcia MJ; de Luna GC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 145(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 18154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eleven-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Kymionis GD; Tsiklis NS; Astyrakakis N; Pallikaris AI; Panagopoulou SI; Pallikaris IG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 17276257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring total corneal power before and after laser in situ keratomileusis with high-speed optical coherence tomography.
    Tang M; Li Y; Avila M; Huang D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1843-50. PubMed ID: 17081867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Cagil N; Aydin B; Ozturk S; Hasiripi H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):642-7. PubMed ID: 17397737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Hamed AM; Wang L; Misra M; Koch DD
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Apr; 109(4):651-8. PubMed ID: 11927420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.