156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13130439)
21. Prevalence and function of Heschl's gyrus morphotypes in musicians.
Benner J; Wengenroth M; Reinhardt J; Stippich C; Schneider P; Blatow M
Brain Struct Funct; 2017 Nov; 222(8):3587-3603. PubMed ID: 28397108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Functional fields in human auditory cortex revealed by time-resolved fMRI without interference of EPI noise.
Di Salle F; Formisano E; Seifritz E; Linden DE; Scheffler K; Saulino C; Tedeschi G; Zanella FE; Pepino A; Goebel R; Marciano E
Neuroimage; 2001 Feb; 13(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 11162273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Neural processes of auditory perception in Heschl's gyrus for upcoming acoustic stimuli in humans.
Hu M; Wang D; Ji X; Yu T; Shan Y; Fan X; Du J; Zhang X; Zhao G; Wang Y; Ren L; Liégeois-Chauvel C
Hear Res; 2020 Mar; 388():107895. PubMed ID: 31982643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.
Gaab N; Gabrieli JD; Glover GH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Aug; 28(8):703-20. PubMed ID: 17080440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise.
Hall DA; Haggard MP; Summerfield AQ; Akeroyd MA; Palmer AR; Bowtell RW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1559-70. PubMed ID: 11325127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The progress in the study on auditory evoked potentials].
Chen F; Yang XP; Fan LH
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 27(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 21899015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spatial dissociation of changes of level and signal-to-noise ratio in auditory cortex for tones in noise.
Ernst SM; Verhey JL; Uppenkamp S
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 18722535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the central auditory pathway following speech and pure-tone stimuli.
Millen SJ; Haughton VM; Yetkin Z
Laryngoscope; 1995 Dec; 105(12 Pt 1):1305-10. PubMed ID: 8523982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results].
Milner R; Rusiniak M; Wolak T; Piatkowska-Janko E; Naumczyk P; Bogorodzki P; Senderski A; Ganc M; Skarzyński H
Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 21916216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians.
Schneider P; Scherg M; Dosch HG; Specht HJ; Gutschalk A; Rupp A
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Jul; 5(7):688-94. PubMed ID: 12068300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of stimulus rate on the auditory cortex using fMRI with 'sparse' temporal sampling.
Tanaka H; Fujita N; Watanabe Y; Hirabuki N; Takanashi M; Oshiro Y; Nakamura H
Neuroreport; 2000 Jun; 11(9):2045-9. PubMed ID: 10884068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sex-specific expression of Heschl's gyrus functional and structural abnormalities in paranoid schizophrenia.
Rojas DC; Teale P; Sheeder J; Simon J; Reite M
Am J Psychiatry; 1997 Dec; 154(12):1655-62. PubMed ID: 9396942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cortical representation of release from auditory masking.
Ernst SM; Uppenkamp S; Verhey JL
Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):835-42. PubMed ID: 19616635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Altered cross-modal processing in the primary auditory cortex of congenitally deaf adults: a visual-somatosensory fMRI study with a double-flash illusion.
Karns CM; Dow MW; Neville HJ
J Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 32(28):9626-38. PubMed ID: 22787048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI.
Scarff CJ; Dort JC; Eggermont JJ; Goodyear BG
Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 Aug; 22(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 15202112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does airborne ultrasound lead to activation of the auditory cortex?
Kühler R; Weichenberger M; Bauer M; Hensel J; Brühl R; Ihlenfeld A; Ittermann B; Sander T; Kühn S; Koch C
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Aug; 64(4):481-493. PubMed ID: 30657739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Modeling hemodynamic responses in auditory cortex at 1.5 T using variable duration imaging acoustic noise.
Hu S; Olulade O; Castillo JG; Santos J; Kim S; Tamer GG; Luh WM; Talavage TM
Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(4):3027-38. PubMed ID: 19948232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.
Gaab N; Gabrieli JD; Glover GH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Aug; 28(8):721-32. PubMed ID: 17089376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of acoustic masking noise in fMRI of the auditory cortex during phonetic discrimination.
Shah NJ; Jäncke L; Grosse-Ruyken ML; Müller-Gärtner HW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Jan; 9(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10030646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dichotic pitch activates pitch processing centre in Heschl's gyrus.
Puschmann S; Uppenkamp S; Kollmeier B; Thiel CM
Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1641-9. PubMed ID: 19782757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
