These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1313377)

  • 1. Preparation of oligozoospermic and/or asthenozoospermic semen for intrauterine insemination using the SpermPrep semen filtration column.
    Ohashi K; Saji F; Wakimoto A; Kato M; Tsutsui T; Tanizawa O
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Apr; 57(4):866-70. PubMed ID: 1313377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preparation of human frozen-thawed seminal specimens using the SpermPrep filtration method: improvements over the conventional swim-up method.
    Zavos PM
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1326-30. PubMed ID: 1601158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of sperm preparation methods. Wash and concentration, swim-up, migration-gravity sedimentation, 80% Percoll and semen filtration column.
    Matsuoka I; Fujino Y; Ito F; Koh B; Kojima T; Ogita S
    J Reprod Med; 1995 May; 40(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 7608872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glass wool column filtration versus mini-Percoll gradient for processing poor quality semen samples.
    Johnson DE; Confino E; Jeyendran RS
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Sep; 66(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 8751748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of quality of spermatozoa prepared by SpermPrep method as compared to those prepared by MiniPercoll.
    Joshi NJ; Raj JP; Sundaram GS
    Andrologia; 1998; 30(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9629427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Percoll discontinuous density gradients vs SpermPrep II vs Sephadex G-50 gel filtration on semen parameters.
    Check JH; Zavos PM; Katsoff D; Kiefer D
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1993 Mar; 169(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 7504330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sperm selection by PD-10 sephadex columns: comparison with SpermPrep filtration and Percoll centrifugation.
    López O; Mata A; Antich M; Bassas L
    Hum Reprod; 1993 May; 8(5):732-6. PubMed ID: 8314969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of sperm morphology and motile sperm count on outcome of intrauterine insemination in oligozoospermia and/or asthenozoospermia.
    Francavilla F; Romano R; Santucci R; Poccia G
    Fertil Steril; 1990 May; 53(5):892-7. PubMed ID: 2185044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrauterine insemination in male subfertility: a comparative study of sperm preparation using a commercial Percoll kit and conventional sperm wash.
    Depypere H; Milingos S; Comhaire F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Oct; 62(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 8582501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved sperm recovery rate with Percoll gradient method in intrauterine insemination.
    Huang HY; Lai YM; Lee CL; Chang MY; Chang SY; Soong YK
    Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 Mar; 19(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8935371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of discontinuous Percoll gradients preparation for selection of motile sperm from poor quality semens.
    Sukcharoen N
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Dec; 77(12):633-8. PubMed ID: 7759973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three sperm preparation media.
    Sharma RK; Seifarth K; Garlak D; Agarwal A
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999; 44(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 10435917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative efficacy of density gradient and swim-up methods of semen preparation in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Butt F; Chohan MA
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 27524522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection of human spermatozoa by a hyperosmotic two-layer Percoll gradient.
    Chan YM; Abuzeid MI; Malcomnson JH; Sasy MA
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Jun; 61(6):1097-102. PubMed ID: 8194624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between the quality and function of sperm after semen processing with two different methods.
    Hammadeh ME; Zavos PM; Rosenbaum P; Schmidt W
    Asian J Androl; 2001 Jun; 3(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11404797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology.
    Smith S; Hosid S; Scott L
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Mar; 63(3):591-7. PubMed ID: 7851592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of sperm quality, morphometry and function among human sperm populations recovered via SpermPrep II filtration, swim-up and Percoll density gradient methods.
    Yamamoto Y; Maenosono S; Okada H; Miyagawa I; Sofikitis N
    Andrologia; 1997; 29(6):303-10. PubMed ID: 9430435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between a two-layer discontinuous Percoll gradient and swim-up for sperm preparation on normal and abnormal semen samples.
    Chen SU; Ho HN; Chen HF; Chao KH; Lin HR; Huang SC; Lee TY; Yang YS
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Nov; 12(10):698-703. PubMed ID: 8624426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of spermatozoa selection on a simplified Percoll gradient in case of asthenozoospermia.
    Mathieu C; Mein M; Lornage J; Li JG; Guerin JF
    Andrologia; 1990; 22(5):467-71. PubMed ID: 1963525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success.
    Karabinus DS; Gelety TJ
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Mar; 67(3):536-41. PubMed ID: 9091343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.