153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1313463)
1. Manifestations of intense noise stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emission and threshold microstructure: experiment and model.
Furst M; Reshef I; Attias J
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Feb; 91(2):1003-14. PubMed ID: 1313463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evoked acoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics in the mustache bat, Pteronotus parnellii.
Kössl M; Vater M
Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 4055535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans.
Baiduc RR; Lee J; Dhar S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):300-14. PubMed ID: 24437770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of disappearing and reappearing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on one subject's threshold microstructure.
Smurzynski J; Probst R
Hear Res; 1998 Jan; 115(1-2):197-205. PubMed ID: 9472748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Synchronization of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to a 2f1-f2 distortion product.
van Dijk P; Wit HP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):850-6. PubMed ID: 2212310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Behavior of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions following intense ipsilateral acoustic stimulation.
Norton SJ; Mott JB; Champlin CA
Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 2708166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intense sounds may alter the mechanical properties of the cochlear partition.
McFadden D
J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Aug; 74(2):447-55. PubMed ID: 6619422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of methods for early detection of noise vulnerability of the inner ear. Amplitude reduction of otoacoustic emissions are most sensitive at submaximal noise impulse exposure].
Plinkert PK; Hemmert W; Zenner HP
HNO; 1995 Feb; 43(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7713771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions in
Cheatham MA; Zhou Y; Goodyear RJ; Dallos P; Richardson GP
eNeuro; 2018; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 30627650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some effects of tonal fatiguing on spontaneous and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Cianfrone G; Mattia M; Cervellini M; Musacchio A
Br J Audiol; 1993 Apr; 27(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 8220278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
Mott JB; Norton SJ; Neely ST; Warr WB
Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 2708165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Additional findings on heritability and prenatal masculinization of cochlear mechanisms: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
McFadden D; Loehlin JC; Pasanen EG
Hear Res; 1996 Aug; 97(1-2):102-19. PubMed ID: 8844191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and sensori-neural hearing loss.
Moulin A; Collet L; Delli D; Morgon A
Acta Otolaryngol; 1991; 111(5):835-41. PubMed ID: 1759568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The structural and functional consequences of acoustic injury in the cochlea and peripheral auditory system: a five year update.
Saunders JC; Cohen YE; Szymko YM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):136-46. PubMed ID: 1880281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What is the cochlear place code for pitch?
Zwislocki JJ
Acta Otolaryngol; 1991; 111(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 2068911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption.
Long GR; Tubis A
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1343-53. PubMed ID: 3198870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves.
Shera CA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):244-62. PubMed ID: 12880039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
Manley GA; van Dijk P
Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():53-62. PubMed ID: 27139323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling cochlear dynamics: interrelation between cochlea mechanics and psychoacoustics.
Epp B; Verhey JL; Mauermann M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1870-83. PubMed ID: 20968359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
