These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1313463)

  • 41. Effect of electrical stimulation on middle latency response in the guinea pig.
    Cannon SC; Miller JM; Crowther J; Moscow D
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1990; 11(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 2240413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates.
    Burns EM; Arehart KH; Campbell SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1571-5. PubMed ID: 1564194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.
    Norrix LW; Glattke TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):945-55. PubMed ID: 8759948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Growth of suppression in the cochlear potentials.
    Cheatham MA
    Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 2995299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The energy spectrum of an impulse: its relation to hearing loss.
    Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA; Hsueh KD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 1880289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of pure-tone forward masking on overshoot.
    Hicks ML; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):228-30. PubMed ID: 1880293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea].
    Xu J; Liu C; Guo L; Lian N; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 12761959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Research on the basic properties of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions].
    Liu B; Liu C; Guo L; Zhao X
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Oct; 18(10):590-2. PubMed ID: 15620134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission recordings during contralateral pure-tone activation of medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Bulut E; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2017 Jun; 104(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 28648121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cochlear nerve fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli: variations with spontaneous rate and other response characteristics.
    Cooper NP; Robertson D; Yates GK
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):370-86. PubMed ID: 8395584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Surface-recorded cochlear microphonic potentials during temporary threshold shifts in man.
    Pratt H; Sohmer H; Barazani N
    Audiology; 1978; 17(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 666656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A computer model of the auditory-nerve response to forward-masking stimuli.
    Meddis R; O'Mard LP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3787-98. PubMed ID: 16018482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Investigating possible mechanisms behind the effect of threshold fine structure on amplitude modulation perception.
    Heise SJ; Mauermann M; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2490-500. PubMed ID: 19894829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Recovery time of the temporary threshold shift for delayed evoked otoacoustic emissions and tone bursts.
    Rossi G; Solero P; Rolando M; Olina M
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1991; 53(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 2008288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Correlated amplitude fluctuations of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    van Dijk P; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):336-43. PubMed ID: 9670526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from free-standing stereovillar bundles of ten species of lizard with small papillae.
    Manley GA
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):33-47. PubMed ID: 16307854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Crossed cochlear influences on monaural temporary threshold shifts.
    Rajan R; Johnstone BM
    Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 9(3):279-94. PubMed ID: 6841284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of hearing sensitivity on mechano-electric transduction.
    Chertoff ME; Yi X; Lichtenhan JT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3251-63. PubMed ID: 14714806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.