These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1313463)

  • 61. The role of intermittence in PTS.
    Ward WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):164-9. PubMed ID: 1880284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Use of acoustic distortion products in clinical diagnosis. The site of origin of otoacoustic emissions in the inner ear].
    Plinkert PK; Harris FP; Probst R
    HNO; 1993 Jul; 41(7):339-44. PubMed ID: 8376180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Low-frequency acoustic modulations generated by the high-frequency portion of the cochlea, noninvasively recorded from the scalp of mice (Mus musculus).
    Henry KR
    J Comp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 114(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 10739309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ear canals: correlation with histopathology and suppression by external tones.
    Clark WW; Kim DO; Zurek PM; Bohne BA
    Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 16(3):299-314. PubMed ID: 6401089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Temporary threshold shift after nuclear magnetic resonance tomography].
    Zwicker E; Schorn K; Vogl T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1990 Aug; 69(8):413-6. PubMed ID: 2222688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Detection of the acoustic reflex below 80 dB HL.
    Neumann J; Uppenkamp S; Kollmeier B
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(6):359-69. PubMed ID: 9390815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Experimental hypercholesterolemia and auditory function in the chinchilla.
    Morizono T; Sikora MA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1982; 90(6):814-8. PubMed ID: 10994435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Auditory enhancement at the absolute threshold of hearing and its relationship to the Zwicker tone.
    Wiegrebe L; Kössl M; Schmidt S
    Hear Res; 1996 Oct; 100(1-2):171-80. PubMed ID: 8922992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [Effect of contralateral noise exposure on otoacoustic distortion product emissions in man].
    Richter B; Hauser R; Löhle E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar; 74(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7755853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Elevation of auditory thresholds by spontaneous cochlear oscillations.
    Powers NL; Salvi RJ; Wang J; Spongr V; Qiu CX
    Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6532):585-7. PubMed ID: 7791874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission latency and cochlear tuning at different stimulus levels.
    Sisto R; Moleti A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2183-90. PubMed ID: 17902854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Human temporary threshold shift (TTS) and damage risk.
    Melnick W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 1880282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Cochlear sensitivity in the lesser spear-nosed bat, Phyllostomus discolor.
    Wittekindt A; Drexl M; Kössl M
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2005 Jan; 191(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15378333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Effects of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on pure-tone frequency difference limens.
    Hansen R; Santurette S; Verhulst S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3147. PubMed ID: 25480062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Lack of association between otoacoustic emissions and hearing difficulty in subjects with normal hearing thresholds.
    Lutman ME; Saunders GH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Aug; 92(2 Pt 1):1184-5. PubMed ID: 1506523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Reliability of spontaneous otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curve measures.
    Zizz CA; Glattke TJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):616-9. PubMed ID: 3230891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Spontaneous and impulsively evoked otoacoustic emissions: indicators of cochlear pathology?
    Ruggero MA; Rich NC; Freyman R
    Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 10(3):283-300. PubMed ID: 6874602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effects of temporary thershold shift on combination-tone generation and on two-tone suppression.
    Smoorenburg GF
    Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):347-55. PubMed ID: 7410239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Modeling the interactions between noise exposure and other variables.
    Humes LE; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 1880287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.