These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13139574)

  • 1. [Results of a new method for the measurement of the pitch and volume discrimination thresholds].
    SCHUBERT K
    Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1953; 163(2-6):437-49. PubMed ID: 13139574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interaction of pitch and loudness discriminations.
    HARRIS JD; PIKLER AG; HOFFMAN HS; EHMER RH
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 Sep; 56(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 13575725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The pitch discrimination threshold and its relation to the intensity discrimination threshold from the clinical viewpoint].
    KOENIG E
    Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1961; 177():530-62. PubMed ID: 13757477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some relationships between pitch discrimination and speech development.
    BRADLEY WH
    Trans Am Laryngol Rhinol Otol Soc; 1959 Jan; 1959():2-18. PubMed ID: 13848110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation into the ability of voice defectives to discriminate among differences in pitch and loudness.
    EISENSON J; KASTEIN S; SCHNEIDERMAN N
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1958 Nov; 23(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 13588682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PITCH DISCRIMINATION BY ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE.
    SHIMIZU H; GELDERMAN A; HARDY WG
    Laryngoscope; 1964 Nov; 74():1570-81. PubMed ID: 14224072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CENTRAL PERIODICITY PITCH.
    NIEDER PC; CREELMAN CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1965 Jan; 37():136-8. PubMed ID: 14265100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of sensorineural lesions on pitch discrimination in cats.
    ELLIOTT DN
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1961 Jun; 70():582-98. PubMed ID: 13726431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AUTOMATIC PITCH DISCRIMINATION TESTING AND RECORDING DEVICE.
    VOOTS RJ; REGER SN
    Public Health Rep (1896); 1965 Jan; 80(1):88-9. PubMed ID: 14255460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The pitch-descriminative function of the pathological ear.
    BUTLER RA; ALBRITE JP
    AMA Arch Otolaryngol; 1956 Apr; 63(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 13312797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [On musical hearing; its relation to bone conduction hearing and cochleovestibular relations].
    KOBRAK F
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1953 Apr; 32(4):253-64. PubMed ID: 13091021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DIPLACUSIS IN UNILATERAL HIGH-FREQUENCY HEARING LOSSES.
    GAETH JH; NORRIS TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1965 Mar; 8():63-75. PubMed ID: 14311806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS OF THE EUCLIDEAN-PYTHAGOREAN STRUCTURE AND QUADRATIC METRICS IN THE PERCEPTUAL MANIFOLD OF THE SENSE OF HEARING.
    JAUHIAINEN T; HAEKKINEN V
    Ann Acad Sci Fenn A; 1964; 106():SUPPL 20:1-20. PubMed ID: 14202158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Musical pitch discrimination by cochlear implant users.
    Ping L; Yuan M; Feng H
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2012 May; 121(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22724279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pitch-discrimination at high frequencies by air- and bone-conduction.
    Corso JF; Levine M
    Am J Psychol; 1965 Dec; 78(4):557-66. PubMed ID: 5839923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some observations on ultrasonic perception in man.
    BELLUCCI RJ; SCHNEIDER DE
    Trans Am Otol Soc; 1962; 50():126-34. PubMed ID: 13967175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A practical method for determination of the frequency discrimination threshold].
    Giaccai F; Cappellini F; Ricci T
    Boll Mal Orecch Gola Naso; 1970; 88(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 5515423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Adaptation, Fowler test, discrimination threshold and masking].
    LANGENBECK B
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1955 Dec; 34(12):778-92. PubMed ID: 13300578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [On a new test of frequency discrimination in a free field].
    Madonia T; Lentini G; Raso D
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1968; 20(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 5746208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination performance of high school sophomores on a battery of auditory tests.
    Elliott DN; Riach WD; Sheposh JP; Trahiotis C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1966; ():Suppl 216:1-59. PubMed ID: 5935910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.