115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1315486)
1. Human papillomavirus infection of the uterine cervix. Tissue sampling and laboratory methods affect correlations between infection rates and dysplasia.
Sherlock CH; Anderson GH; Benedet JL; Bowie WR; Coldman AJ; Percival-Smith RK; Rennie PS; Shade RO
Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 May; 97(5):692-8. PubMed ID: 1315486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Presence of human papillomavirus infection of the uterine cervix as determined by different detection methods in a low-risk community-based population.
Zazove P; Reed BD; Gregoire L; Gorenflo DW; Lancaster WD; Ruffin MT; Hruszczyk J
Arch Fam Med; 1993 Dec; 2(12):1250-8. PubMed ID: 8130906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular diagnosis of genital human papillomavirus infection: comparison of two methods used to collect exfoliated cervical cells.
Vermund SH; Schiffman MH; Goldberg GL; Ritter DB; Weltman A; Burk RD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 160(2):304-8. PubMed ID: 2537011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of human papillomavirus in matched cervical smears and biopsy specimens by non-isotopic in situ hybridisation.
Troncone G; Herrington CS; Cooper K; de Angelis ML; McGee JO
J Clin Pathol; 1992 Apr; 45(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 1315807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human papillomavirus detection in cervical lesions nondiagnostic for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: correlation with Papanicolaou smear, colposcopy, and occurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Nuovo GJ; Blanco JS; Leipzig S; Smith D
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 75(6):1006-11. PubMed ID: 2160630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human papillomavirus infection of the cervix detected by cervicovaginal lavage and molecular hybridization: correlation with biopsy results and Papanicolaou smear.
Burk RD; Kadish AS; Calderin S; Romney SL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 May; 154(5):982-9. PubMed ID: 3010725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of human papilloma virus in women referred for colposcopy. A comparison between different diagnostic methods.
Bodén E; Evander M; Wadell G; Bjersing L; von Schoultz B; Rylander E
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1990; 69(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 2166988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of human papillomavirus in cervical smears. A comparison of in situ hybridization, immunocytochemistry and cytopathology.
Gupta JW; Gupta PK; Rosenshein N; Shah KV
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 3037829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of uterine cervical cytology and biopsy results: indications and outcomes for colposcopy.
Swinker M; Cutlip AC; Ogle D
J Fam Pract; 1994 Jan; 38(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 8289050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Cytobrush and cervicovaginal lavage sampling methods for the detection of genital human papillomavirus.
Goldberg GL; Vermund SH; Schiffman MH; Ritter DB; Spitzer C; Burk RD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Dec; 161(6 Pt 1):1669-72. PubMed ID: 2557764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colposcopy, punch biopsy, in situ DNA hybridization, and the polymerase chain reaction in searching for genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in women with normal PAP smears.
Syrjänen S; Saastamoinen J; Chang FJ; Ji HX; Syrjänen K
J Med Virol; 1990 Aug; 31(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 2176670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between atypical colposcopy findings and detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection of the uterine cervix.
Perovic M; Berisavac M; Kuljic-Kapulica N; Jovanovic T
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11876390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colposcopic survey of Papanicolaou test-negative cases with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis.
Cecchini S; Iossa A; Ciatto S; Bonardi L; Confortini M; Cipparrone G
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Nov; 76(5 Pt 1):857-9. PubMed ID: 2170888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histological and cytological evidence of viral infection and human papillomavirus type 16 DNA sequences in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and normal tissue in the west of Scotland: evaluation of treatment policy.
Murdoch JB; Cassidy LJ; Fletcher K; Cordiner JW; Macnab JC
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Feb; 296(6619):381-5. PubMed ID: 2830935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of in-situ hybridization of smears and biopsies for papilloma virus genotyping of the uterine cervix.
Czerwenka KF; Schön HJ; Manavi M; Zeillinger R; Kubista E; Gitsch E
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1991 Feb; 29(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 1646655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Occurrence of human papillomavirus DNA types 16 and 18 (HPV-16/18) in cervical smears as compared to cytological findings.
Köchel HG; Teichmann A; Eckardt N; Arendt P; Kuhn W; Thomssen R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1990 Feb; 31(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 1968861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colposcopy is superior to cytology for the detection of early genital human papillomavirus infection.
Schneider A; Sterzik K; Buck G; De Villiers EM
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Feb; 71(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 2827083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biologic characteristics of specific human papillomavirus types predicted from morphology of cervical lesions.
Kadish AS; Hagan RJ; Ritter DB; Goldberg GL; Romney SL; Kanetsky PA; Beiss BK; Burk RD
Hum Pathol; 1992 Nov; 23(11):1262-9. PubMed ID: 1330876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between colposcopic, cytologic, and histologic findings in women positive and negative for human papillomavirus DNA.
Moscicki AB; Broering J; Powell K; Klein J; Clayton L; Smith G; Boero S; Darragh TM; Brescia RJ; Palefsky J
J Adolesc Health; 1993 Mar; 14(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 8386548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated polymerase chain reaction for papillomavirus screening of cervicovaginal lavages: comparison with dot-blot hybridization in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic population.
Morris BJ; Rose BR; Flanagan JL; McKinnon KJ; Loo CY; Thompson CH; Flampoulidou M; Ford RM; Hunter JC; Nightingale BN
J Med Virol; 1990 Sep; 32(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 2173735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
