These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1316828)

  • 21. Tutorial in biostatistics: sample sizes for parallel group clinical trials with binary data.
    Julious SA; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(24):2904-36. PubMed ID: 22714646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comments on 'How conservative is Fisher's exact test? A quantitative evaluation of the two-sample comparative binomial trial' by G. G. Crans and J. J. Shuster, Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:3598-3611.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):173-4. PubMed ID: 18825654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A computer program for sample size and power calculations in the design of multi-arm and factorial clinical trials with survival time endpoints.
    Natarajan R; Turnbull BW; Slate EH; Clark LC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1996 Mar; 49(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 8735021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biostatistics in clinical trials: Part 2. Determining sample sizes for clinical trials.
    Ellenberg SS
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1989 Aug; 3(8):39-46; discussion 48, 51. PubMed ID: 2519197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using Lancaster's mid-P correction to the Fisher's exact test for adverse impact analyses.
    Biddle DA; Morris SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):956-65. PubMed ID: 21688881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Designing clinical trials for two-sided multiple comparisons with a control.
    Bristol DR
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Jun; 10(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 2752764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sample sizes for the exact test of 'no interaction' in 2 X 2 X 2 tables.
    Haber M
    Biometrics; 1983 Jun; 39(2):493-8. PubMed ID: 6354289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A note on the power of Fisher's least significant difference procedure.
    Meier U
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 17128424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sample size determination based on rank tests in clinical trials.
    Wang H; Chen B; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):735-51. PubMed ID: 14584719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sensitivity of Fisher's exact test to minor perturbations in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Dupont WD
    Stat Med; 1986; 5(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 3823670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Power of testing proportions in small two-sample studies when sample sizes are equal.
    Davis AB
    Stat Med; 1993 Apr; 12(8):777-87. PubMed ID: 8516594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sample size calculations for noninferiority trials with Poisson distributed count data.
    Stucke K; Kieser M
    Biom J; 2013 Mar; 55(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 23401289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The inexact use of Fisher's Exact Test in six major medical journals.
    McKinney WP; Young MJ; Hartz A; Lee MB
    JAMA; 1989 Jun; 261(23):3430-3. PubMed ID: 2724487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sample sizes based on the log-rank statistic in complex clinical trials.
    Lakatos E
    Biometrics; 1988 Mar; 44(1):229-41. PubMed ID: 3358991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
    Odani M; Fukimbara S; Sato T
    Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 28059578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A self-designing rule for clinical trials with arbitrary response variables.
    Hartung J
    Control Clin Trials; 2001 Apr; 22(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11306149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A two-stage design for randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Wieand S; Therneau T
    Control Clin Trials; 1987 Mar; 8(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 3568693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficient power computation for exact and mid-P tests for the common odds ratio in several 2 x 2 tables.
    Hirji KF; Tang ML; Vollset SE; Elashoff RM
    Stat Med; 1994 Aug; 13(15):1539-49. PubMed ID: 7973232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Paired versus two-sample design for a clinical trial of treatments with dichotomous outcome: power considerations.
    Wacholder S; Weinberg CR
    Biometrics; 1982 Sep; 38(3):801-12. PubMed ID: 7171700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.