These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1323202)

  • 1. Assessing a technology: what constitutes enough?
    Berg AO
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1992; 5(4):439-40. PubMed ID: 1323202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush: comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Pfenninger JL
    J Reprod Med; 1992 Jun; 37(6):A32. PubMed ID: 1619600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endometrial cytology by a new technic.
    Milan AR; Markley RL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Sep; 42(3):469-75. PubMed ID: 4579578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health technology assessment.
    Gellman DD
    CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):886. PubMed ID: 8383576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
    Noel ML
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use effectiveness of the Cytobrush in the primary care setting.
    Cauthen DB; Cullison M; Symm B; Peterson RF
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1992; 5(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 1496891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of cervical cytology.
    McCrory DC; Matchar DB; Bastian L; Datta S; Hasselblad V; Hickey J; Myers E; Nanda K
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 1999 Jan; (5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11925972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical considerations in data acquisition.
    Riis P
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1986; 2(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 10276246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
    Lai-Goldman M; Nieberg RK; Mulcahy D; Wiesmeier E
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup report on Methodology. Methodological guidance for the conduct of health technology assessment.
    Liberati A; Sheldon TA; Banta HD
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(2):186-219. PubMed ID: 9194352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comments on standards in proteomics and the concept of fitness-for-purpose.
    Duncan MW; Hunsucker SW
    Proteomics; 2006 Sep; 6 Suppl 2():45-7. PubMed ID: 17031796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cytobrush washings and false-negative reports.
    Gupta RK; Naran S; Fauck R; Buchanan A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1988; 4(4):360-1. PubMed ID: 3076111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic technology assessments: problems and prospects.
    Kent DL; Larson EB
    Ann Intern Med; 1988 May; 108(5):759-61. PubMed ID: 3358576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Papanicolaou smear cell recovery techniques used by primary care physicians.
    Clement KD; Christenson PD
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1990; 3(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 2248091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cost-effectiveness of three new technologies to enhance Pap testing.
    Tecnologica MAP Suppl; 1998 Feb; ():40-1. PubMed ID: 10183360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing assessment: evaluating geriatric technology.
    Patterson CJ
    CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):897-9, 902-4. PubMed ID: 8448703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interactive technology assessment and wide reflective equilibrium.
    Reuzel RP; van der Wilt GJ; ten Have HA; de Vries Robbé PF
    J Med Philos; 2001 Jun; 26(3):245-61. PubMed ID: 11445880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monolayer slide preparation and automated slide reading systems for cervical cancer screening--clinical-effectiveness analysis.
    Tecnologica MAP Suppl; 1998 Feb; ():34-9. PubMed ID: 10183359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. HTA principles need rigorous review.
    Gibson JM; Little A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Oct; 26(4):428-9; author reply 429-30. PubMed ID: 20942982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automation of the analysis of cell images.
    Preston K
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1980; 2(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 6103684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.