369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1323923)
1. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 1323923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic pattern of microcalcifications in the preoperative diagnosis of comedo ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathologic correlation.
Hermann G; Keller RJ; Drossman S; Caravella BA; Tartter P; Panetta RA; Bleiweiss IJ
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Aug; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 10459309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL; Meyer JE; Harris JR
Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 2544922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass.
Stomper PC; Geradts J; Edge SB; Levine EG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Focal areas of increased opacity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the comedo type: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Kinkel K; Gilles R; Féger C; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon AA; Masselot J; Vanel D
Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 8029412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Holland R; Hendriks JH
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Microcalcifications associated with in situ ductal breast carcinoma. Mammographic and histological correlations with morphometric evaluation].
Negri S; Capitanio A; Pegorari E; Azzolini D; Sardo P
Pathologica; 1999 Jun; 91(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 10536463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtype.
Slanetz PJ; Giardino AA; Oyama T; Koerner FC; Halpern EF; Moore RH; Kopans DB
Breast J; 2001; 7(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 11843854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications.
Dershaw DD; Abramson A; Kinne DW
Radiology; 1989 Feb; 170(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 2536185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast biopsy for calcifications in nonpalpable breast lesions. A prospective study.
Franceschi D; Crowe J; Zollinger R; Duchesneau R; Shenk R; Stefanek G; Shuck JM
Arch Surg; 1990 Feb; 125(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 2154171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qualitative Radiogenomics: Association Between BI-RADS Calcification Descriptors and Recurrence Risk as Assessed by the Oncotype DX Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Score.
Woodard GA; Price ER
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):919-924. PubMed ID: 30714832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic features predicting an extensive intraductal component in early-stage infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 1309620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the appearance of microcalcifications on mammography useful in predicting histological grade of malignancy in ductal cancer in situ?
Dinkel HP; Gassel AM; Tschammler A
Br J Radiol; 2000 Sep; 73(873):938-44. PubMed ID: 11064645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy in estimating tumor extension according to mammographic subtypes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Sato M; Fukutomi T; Akashi-Tanaka S; Miyakawa K; Yamamoto N; Hasegawa T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2002 May; 32(5):157-61. PubMed ID: 12110641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast specimen microcalcifications: radiographic validation and pathologic-radiologic correlation.
D'Orsi CJ; Reale FR; Davis MA; Brown VJ
Radiology; 1991 Aug; 180(2):397-401. PubMed ID: 1648756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.
Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: review of 909 cases with radiographic-pathologic correlations.
Barreau B; de Mascarel I; Feuga C; MacGrogan G; Dilhuydy MH; Picot V; Dilhuydy JM; de Lara CT; Bussières E; Schreer I
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 54(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 15797293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-grade histologic features of DCIS are associated with R5 rather than R3 calcifications in breast screening mammography.
Hayes BD; Brodie C; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM
Breast J; 2013; 19(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 23600490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening.
Hofvind S; Iversen BF; Eriksen L; Styr BM; Kjellevold K; Kurz KD
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 21498306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
