These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1324949)

  • 1. Measurements of uterine volume: a comparison between measurements by ultrasonography and by water displacement.
    Wiener JJ; Newcombe RG
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1992 Sep; 20(7):457-60. PubMed ID: 1324949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasonographic assessment of weight of the myomatous uterus: a pilot study using a new combined geometrical formula.
    Rovio PH; Luukkaala T; Vuento M; Oksa S; Sundström H; Heinonen PK
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Apr; 137(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 17383793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The estimated volume of the fibroid uterus: a comparison of ultrasound and bimanual examination versus volume at MRI or hysterectomy.
    Stoelinga B; Huirne J; Heymans MW; Reekers JA; Ankum WM; Hehenkamp WJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jan; 184():89-96. PubMed ID: 25481364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound of the normal nongravid uterus: correlation with gross and histopathology.
    Platt JF; Bree RL; Davidson D
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2152778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between ultrasonic volume and actual weight of pathologic uterus.
    Kung FT; Chang SY
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1996; 42(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 8840176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-operative ultrasonographic evaluation of nongravid, enlarged uteri--correlation with bimanual examination.
    Dekel A; Farhi J; Levy T; Orvieto R; Shalev Y; Dicker D; Bar-Hava I; Ben-Rafael Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Oct; 80(2):205-7. PubMed ID: 9846670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sonographic evaluation of uterine volume and its clinical importance.
    Sheth SS; Hajari AR; Lulla CP; Kshirsagar D
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Jan; 43(1):185-189. PubMed ID: 27928854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting uterine weight before hysterectomy: ultrasound measurements vs clinical assessment.
    Goldstein SR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):e16. PubMed ID: 17346506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uterine volume and endometrial thickness in healthy girls evaluated by ultrasound (3-dimensional) and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hagen CP; Mouritsen A; Mieritz MG; Tinggaard J; Wohlfahrt-Veje C; Fallentin E; Brocks V; Sundberg K; Jensen LN; Juul A; Main KM
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Aug; 104(2):452-9.e2. PubMed ID: 26051091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in uterus volume measurements; comparison with two-dimensional ultrasound.
    Yaman C; Jesacher K; Pölz W
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Dec; 29(12):1681-4. PubMed ID: 14698334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional transvaginal sonographic assessment of uterine volume as preoperative predictor of need to morcellate in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Gerges B; Mongelli M; Casikar I; Bignardi T; Condous G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 50(2):255-260. PubMed ID: 27281513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and sonographic estimations of uterine weight.
    Hendrix NW; Chauhan SP; Carroll CS; Magann EF; Morrison JC
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 44(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 12744146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting uterine weight before hysterectomy: ultrasound measurements versus clinical assessment.
    Harb TS; Adam RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 193(6):2122-5. PubMed ID: 16325627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of uterine volume with ultrasound in women with endometrial carcinoma.
    Shipley CF; Smith ST; Launer RL; Nelson GH
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Aug; 38(8):608-10. PubMed ID: 8410866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency-dependent complex modulus of the uterus: preliminary results.
    Kiss MZ; Hobson MA; Varghese T; Harter J; Kliewer MA; Hartenbach EM; Zagzebski JA
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3683-95. PubMed ID: 16861774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The inaccuracy of total uterine volume measurements: sources of error and a proposed solution.
    Kurtz AB; Shaw WM; Kurtz RJ; Rifkin MD; Pasto ME; Cole-Beuglet C; Baltarowich OH; Wapner RJ; Foy PM; Morgan PM
    J Ultrasound Med; 1984 Jul; 3(7):289-97. PubMed ID: 6748147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of laparoscopic uterine artery coagulation in management of symptomatic myomas: A prospective study using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Simsek M; Sadik S; Taskin O; Guler H; Onoglu A; Akar M; Kursun S; Tinar S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 16825073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laser ablation of the endometrium: MR appearance during and after treatment and the relation of MR appearance to clinical outcome.
    deSouza NM; McMillan DL; Puni RK; Coutts GA; Hall AS; Harris DN; Young IR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1121-6. PubMed ID: 8911162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ovarian cyst formation in women using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system vs. hysterectomy.
    Inki P; Hurskainen R; Palo P; Ekholm E; Grenman S; Kivelä A; Kujansuu E; Teperi J; Yliskoski M; Paavonen J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 20(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 12383322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.