These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13251631)

  • 1. An analysis of ten years' experience of caesarean section at the maternity hospital Marika Iliadi, Athens.
    FOUCAS M; KARPOUSOGLOU J; GEORGIADES B
    Gynaecologia; 1955 Jul; 140(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 13251631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Cesarean section in the Maternity Hospital Concepción Palacios during the years 1951-1952].
    BRANDT PACHECO F
    Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez; 1955; 15(3):1047-72. PubMed ID: 13336784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of an expected caesarean section rate taking into account the case mix of a maternity hospital. Analysis from the AUDIPOG Sentinelle Network (France). Obstetricians of AUDIPOG. Association of Users of Computerised Files in Perinatalogy, Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
    David S; Mamelle N; Rivière O
    BJOG; 2001 Sep; 108(9):919-26. PubMed ID: 11563460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cesarean section in the Maternity Hospital of San Juan de Dios].
    LIZANA L
    Bol Soc Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1955 Aug; 20(5):149-50. PubMed ID: 13284093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinico-statistical data on cesarean section in the maternity hospital of Foggia (Report of a 20-year period)].
    CAMPLI C; DE CESARE PR
    Quad Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1959 Oct; 14():937-48. PubMed ID: 13807324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nulliparous caesarean section in the home of active management of labour.
    How K; Foley M; Stronge J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Feb; 35(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 7771991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean sections at St. Louis Maternity Hospital from 1948 through 1952.
    HASKINS AL; WISSNER SE; ALLEN WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1955 Jul; 70(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 14388065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates.
    Fielke RJ
    Med J Aust; 2014 Feb; 200(2):84. PubMed ID: 24484102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates.
    Lee YY; Roberts CL; Patterson JA
    Med J Aust; 2014 Feb; 200(2):84-5. PubMed ID: 24484103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternity hospitals ranking on prophylactic caesarean section rates: uncertainty associated with ranks.
    Rabilloud M; Ecochard R; Estève J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Jan; 94(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 11134839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changing caesarean section rates. Experience at a Sydney obstetric teaching hospital.
    Blumenthal NJ; Harris RS; O'Connor MC; Lancaster PA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Nov; 24(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 6598375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rates of caesarean section and neonatal mortality.
    Taylor U; Zentay Z; Ganesh V; Apuzzio J; Murphy G; Iffy L
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Aug; 32(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 1445126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Incidence of surgical interventions at the Sao Paulo Maternity Hospital; statistical account of the various operations].
    PEREIRA FM
    Rev Gynecol Obstet; 1953 Apr; 47(1 4):276-80. PubMed ID: 13075008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in caesarean and instrumental delivery rates in New Zealand hospitals.
    Johnson N; Ansell D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Feb; 35(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 7772003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?
    Nair DB; Majoko F
    BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1713. PubMed ID: 26498306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An audit of caesarean section in a maternity district.
    Rosenberg K; Hepburn M; McIlwaine G
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Oct; 89(10):787-92. PubMed ID: 7126498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Authors' reply re: Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?
    Le Ray C; Blondel B; Prunet C; Khireddine I; Deneux-Tharaux C; Goffinet F
    BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1713-4. PubMed ID: 26498305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cesarean section: descriptive epidemiology. Increase in frequency of indications for cesarean section].
    Cerrone L; Basevi V
    Epidemiol Prev; 1992 Mar; 14(50):20-8. PubMed ID: 1297591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ten years' Caesarean section in Denmark 1941 to 1950, with special reference to indications and maternal mortality.
    BRANDSTRUP E; SCHOU P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1954; 33(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 13157981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Is the high frequency of Caesarean sections in a highly specialized gyneco-obstetric hospital justifiable?].
    Guzmán Ibarra Mde L; Ablanedo Aguirre J; Basavilvazo Rodríguez MA; Martínez Rodríguez OA; Ahumada Ramírez E
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2003 Jun; 71():291-6. PubMed ID: 14515659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.