These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13252195)

  • 1. Transposition in the white rat as a function of stimulus comparison.
    THOMPSON R
    J Exp Psychol; 1955 Sep; 50(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 13252195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TRANSPOSITION IN ADULTS WITH SIMULTANEOUS AND SUCCESSIVE STIMULUS PRESENTATION.
    ZEILER MD
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jul; 68():103-7. PubMed ID: 14177672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus alternation in peripherally blinded rats.
    DEMBER WN
    Can J Psychol; 1958 Dec; 12(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 13608335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus similarity and sequence of stimulus presentation in paired-associate learning.
    ROTHKOPF EZ
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 Aug; 56(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 13575707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus meaning in stimulus predifferentiation.
    PFAFFLIN SM
    J Exp Psychol; 1960 Apr; 59():269-74. PubMed ID: 14432498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paired-associate learning as a function of similarity: common stimulus and response items within the list.
    UMEMOTO T; HILGARD ER
    J Exp Psychol; 1961 Aug; 62():97-104. PubMed ID: 13779140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of an anchor stimulus on the stimulus generalization gradient.
    GANZ L
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Mar; 65():270-9. PubMed ID: 13946425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning through stimulus satiation.
    DENNY MR
    J Exp Psychol; 1957 Jul; 54(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 13449251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of post-stimulus conditions on the secondary reinforcing power of a stimulus.
    KEEHN JD
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1962 Feb; 55():22-6. PubMed ID: 14454778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus attributes and drive in paired-associate learning.
    LEVITT H; GOSS AE
    J Exp Psychol; 1961 Sep; 62():243-52. PubMed ID: 14464719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. LEARNING OF RESPONSES TO STIMULUS CLASSES AND TO SPECIFIC STIMULI.
    COHEN BH; HUT PA
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Sep; 66():274-80. PubMed ID: 14047766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. BACKWARD LEARNING AND THE STIMULUS-FAMILIARIZATION INHIBITORY EFFECT.
    SIMON S; WOOD G
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Apr; 67():310-5. PubMed ID: 14165643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus context and satiation.
    KIVY PN; EARL RW; WALKER EL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1956 Feb; 49(1):90-2. PubMed ID: 13295415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FUNCTIONAL STIMULUS LEARNING AS RELATED TO DEGREE OF PRACTICE AND MEANINGFULNESS.
    LEICHT KL; KAUSLER DH
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jan; 69():100-1. PubMed ID: 14256239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence that the secondary reinforcing stimulus must be discriminated.
    McGUIGAN FJ; CROCKETT F
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 Feb; 55(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 13513934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amount of pretraining as a factor in stimulus predifferentiation and performance set.
    CANTOR JH
    J Exp Psychol; 1955 Sep; 50(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 13252194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of stimulus satiation in spontaneous alternation.
    GLANZER M
    J Exp Psychol; 1953 Jun; 45(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 13052878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The interaction of ability and amount of practice with stimulus and response meaningfulness (m, m) in paired-associate learning.
    CIEUTAT VJ; STOCKWELL FE; NOBLE CE
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 Sep; 56(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 13575720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gradients of drive stimulus (SD) intensity generalization.
    YAMAGUCHI HG
    J Exp Psychol; 1952 Apr; 43(4):298-9. PubMed ID: 14946339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EFFECT OF SUCCESSIVE ADDITION OF STIMULUS ELEMENTS ON PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING.
    BROWN SC; BATTIG WF; PEARLSTEIN R
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():87-93. PubMed ID: 14315136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.