These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1326273)

  • 1. Virus disease as a consequence of viral pathogenicity and the anti-viral immune response.
    Rott R; Becht H
    Behring Inst Mitt; 1992 Apr; (91):38-45. PubMed ID: 1326273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Infectious bursal disease--B cell dependent immunodeficiency syndrome in chickens.
    Becht H; Müller H
    Behring Inst Mitt; 1991 Jul; (89):217-25. PubMed ID: 1656933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Various sides of influenza, part I--structure, replication, changeability of influenza viruses, clinical course of the disease, immunological response and laboratory diagnostics].
    Machała MK; Brydak LB
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2006 Sep; 21(123):270-6. PubMed ID: 17163190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defense mechanisms against influenza virus infection in the respiratory tract mucosa.
    Tamura S; Kurata T
    Jpn J Infect Dis; 2004 Dec; 57(6):236-47. PubMed ID: 15623947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Immunological problems of influenza virus infections].
    Schmidt J; Süss J; Stelzner A
    Arch Exp Veterinarmed; 1978; 32(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 81042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lack of pathogenicity of five serotype 2 infectious bursal disease viruses in chickens.
    Ismail NM; Saif YM; Moorhead PD
    Avian Dis; 1988; 32(4):757-9. PubMed ID: 2849404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immunogenicity and antigenicity of infectious bursal disease virus serotypes I and II in chickens.
    Jackwood DJ; Saif YM; Moorhead PD
    Avian Dis; 1985; 29(4):1184-94. PubMed ID: 3008699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of standard and variant strains of infectious bursal disease virus on infections of chickens.
    Craft DW; Brown J; Lukert PD
    Am J Vet Res; 1990 Aug; 51(8):1192-7. PubMed ID: 2167031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influenza and vaccinia viruses expressing malaria CD8+ T and B cell epitopes. Comparison of their immunogenicity and capacity to induce protective immunity.
    Rodrigues M; Li S; Murata K; Rodriguez D; Rodriguez JR; Bacik I; Bennink JR; Yewdell JW; Garcia-Sastre A; Nussenzweig RS
    J Immunol; 1994 Nov; 153(10):4636-48. PubMed ID: 7525709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antibodies and B cell memory in viral immunity.
    Dörner T; Radbruch A
    Immunity; 2007 Sep; 27(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 17892847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Susceptibility of ducks and duck-origin cell cultures to infectious bursal disease virus.
    Yamada S; Matsuo K; Uchinuno Y
    Avian Dis; 1982; 26(3):596-601. PubMed ID: 6293447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental infection of turkeys with infectious bursal disease virus and the effect on the immunocompetence of infected turkeys.
    Chui CH; Thorsen J
    Avian Dis; 1984; 28(1):197-207. PubMed ID: 6326741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Failure of two serotype II infectious bursal disease viruses to affect the humoral immune response of turkeys.
    Jackwood DJ; Saif YM; Moorhead PD; Bishop G
    Avian Dis; 1984; 28(1):100-16. PubMed ID: 6202292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of inactivated oil emulsion infectious bursal disease vaccines in breeder chickens to prevent immunosuppression in progeny chicks.
    Wood GW; Muskett JC; Thornton DH
    Res Vet Sci; 1983 Jul; 35(1):114-5. PubMed ID: 6312519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Viral reproductive strategies: How can lytic viruses be evolutionarily competitive?
    Komarova NL
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Dec; 249(4):766-84. PubMed ID: 17945261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against variant A infectious bursal disease virus.
    Cruz-Coy JS; Giambrone JJ; Panangala VS
    Avian Dis; 1993; 37(2):406-11. PubMed ID: 8395799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between the effect of an avian reovirus and infectious bursal disease virus on selected aspects of the immune system of the chicken.
    Montgomery RD; Villegas P; Dawe DL; Brown J
    Avian Dis; 1986; 30(2):298-308. PubMed ID: 3015115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responses of specific-pathogen-free chicks to concomitant infections of reovirus (WVU-2937) and infectious bursal disease virus.
    Springer WT; Olson NO; Kerr KM; Fabacher CJ
    Avian Dis; 1983; 27(4):911-7. PubMed ID: 6316898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the host system on the pathogenicity, immunogenicity, and antigenicity of infectious bursal disease virus.
    Hassan MK; Saif YM
    Avian Dis; 1996; 40(3):553-61. PubMed ID: 8883783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immunosuppressive potential and pathogenicity of a recent isolate of infectious bursal disease virus in commercial broiler chickens.
    Rosales AG; Villegas P; Lukert PD; Fletcher OJ; Brown J
    Avian Dis; 1989; 33(4):724-8. PubMed ID: 2559704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.