These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1326561)

  • 21. Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxylapatite-coated titanium for dental implant applications.
    Cook SD; Kay JF; Thomas KA; Jarcho M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1987; 2(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 3032787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-dimensional bone response to commercially pure titanium, hydroxyapatite, and calcium-ion-mixing titanium in rabbits.
    Ichikawa T; Hanawa T; Ukai H; Murakami K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 10795455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of porous bioactive titanium.
    Takemoto M; Fujibayashi S; Neo M; Suzuki J; Kokubo T; Nakamura T
    Biomaterials; 2005 Oct; 26(30):6014-23. PubMed ID: 15885769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characterizations of titanium implant surfaces. III.
    Keller JC; Stanford CM; Wightman JP; Draughn RA; Zaharias R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Aug; 28(8):939-46. PubMed ID: 7983092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reactions of bone tissue in old rats to three different implant materials.
    Shirota T; Donath K; Matsui Y; Ohno K; Michi K
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 7643440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium for use as an orthopedic biologic attachment system.
    Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF; Jarcho M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 May; (230):303-12. PubMed ID: 2835198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics.
    Lumbikanonda N; Sammons R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):627-36. PubMed ID: 11669244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
    Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Osteogenetic activity of BMP-3-coated titanium specimens of different surface texture at the orthotopic implant bed of giant rabbits].
    Esenwein SA; Esenwein S; Herr G; Muhr G; Küsswetter W; Hartwig CH
    Chirurg; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1360-8. PubMed ID: 11766662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bonding capacity in bone of HIP-processed HA-coated titanium: mechanical and histological investigations.
    Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T; Kleven E; Rørvik AM; Haanaes HR
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Nov; 29(11):1443-9. PubMed ID: 8582913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition.
    Thomas KA; Cook SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985 Oct; 19(8):875-901. PubMed ID: 3880349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vivo evaluation of plasma-sprayed titanium coating after alkali modification.
    Xue W; Liu X; Zheng X; Ding C
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(16):3029-37. PubMed ID: 15603798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical applications of a hydroxyapatite-coated dental implant.
    Chino T; Gotoh K; Veda A
    Int J Oral Implantol; 1991; 8(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 1667080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The reaction of rabbit bones to coated and uncoated metal implants at the end of a 90-day experiment].
    Knöfler G; Wagner C; Wohlgemuth B; Knöfler W
    Stomatol DDR; 1982 May; 32(5):337-47. PubMed ID: 6956058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ["Functional coatings for implants in orthopedics and dental care based on semiconducting valve metals"].
    Thull R; Repenning D
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990; 35 Suppl 3():28-9. PubMed ID: 2078734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants.
    Hayashi K; Inadome T; Mashima T; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 8314808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Tissue response to hydroxylapatite implant in the femurs of rabbits].
    Choie MK; Bae C
    Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi; 1987 Jan; 25(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 3036977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Bone apposition following intraboney periodontal implantation of compact and phycogenic hydroxylapatite ceramic graft material].
    Bieniek KW; Spiedkermann H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Sep; 44(9):697-9. PubMed ID: 2561596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants.
    Johansson CB; Sennerby L; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 1820312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The interface of calcium-phosphate and glass-ceramic in bone, a structural analysis.
    Gross UM; Müller-Mai CM; Voigt C
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jul; 11():83-5. PubMed ID: 2397266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.