177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1328092)
1. Changes in fat-free mass in obese subjects after weight loss: a comparison of body composition measures.
van der Kooy K; Leenen R; Deurenberg P; Seidell JC; Westerterp KR; Hautvast JG
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1992 Sep; 16(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 1328092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of body composition methods and predictions, and calculation of density and hydration fraction of fat-free mass, in obese women.
Fuller NJ; Sawyer MB; Elia M
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1994 Jul; 18(7):503-12. PubMed ID: 7920877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bedside and field methods for assessing body composition: comparison with the deuterium dilution technique.
Pullicino E; Coward WA; Stubbs RJ; Elia M
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1990 Oct; 44(10):753-62. PubMed ID: 2269254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of fat free mass on prediction of densitometric body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by anthropometry.
Han TS; Carter R; Currall JE; Lean ME
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1996 Aug; 50(8):542-8. PubMed ID: 8863015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of body-composition methodology on the composition of weight loss and weight gain.
Pourhassan M; Schautz B; Braun W; Gluer CC; Bosy-Westphal A; Müller MJ
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2013 May; 67(5):446-54. PubMed ID: 23422922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in fat free mass in overweight patients with rheumatoid arthritis on a weight reducing regimen. A comparison of eight different body composition methods.
Heitmann BL; Kondrup J; Engelhart M; Kristensen JH; Pødenphant J; Høie H; Andersen V
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1994 Dec; 18(12):812-9. PubMed ID: 7894520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Body mass index and bioelectrical vector distribution in 8-year-old children.
Guida B; Pietrobelli A; Trio R; Laccetti R; Falconi C; Perrino NR; Principato S; Pecoraro P
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2008 Feb; 18(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 17307345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential use of bioelectrical impedance of the 'whole body' and of body segments for the assessment of body composition: comparison with densitometry and anthropometry.
Fuller NJ; Elia M
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1989 Nov; 43(11):779-91. PubMed ID: 2627926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in body composition during weight loss in obese subjects in the NUGENOB study: comparison of bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Verdich C; Barbe P; Petersen M; Grau K; Ward L; Macdonald I; Sørensen TI; Oppert JM
Diabetes Metab; 2011 Jun; 37(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 21236715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Assessment of body composition in groups of subjects with different body size. Comparison of skinfold thickness and impedance methods].
Buscemi S; Maneri R; Di Noto A; Verga S
Ann Ital Med Int; 1994; 9(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 7893571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of methods used in body composition analysis on the prediction of resting energy expenditure.
Korth O; Bosy-Westphal A; Zschoche P; Glüer CC; Heller M; Müller MJ
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2007 May; 61(5):582-9. PubMed ID: 17136038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Indirect estimates of body composition are useful for groups but unreliable in individuals.
Piers LS; Soares MJ; Frandsen SL; O'Dea K
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2000 Sep; 24(9):1145-52. PubMed ID: 11033983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic gastric banding and body composition in morbid obesity.
Guida B; Belfiore A; Angrisani L; Micanti F; Mauriello C; Trio R; Pecoraro P; Falconi C
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2005 Jun; 15(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 15955468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Body composition by hydrometry (deuterium oxide dilution) and bioelectrical impedance in subjects aged >60 y from rural regions of Cuba, Chile and Mexico.
Valencia ME; Alemán-Mateo H; Salazar G; Hernández Triana M
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2003 Jul; 27(7):848-55. PubMed ID: 12821972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Body composition assessment in adults with cystic fibrosis: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance analysis.
King S; Wilson J; Kotsimbos T; Bailey M; Nyulasi I
Nutrition; 2005; 21(11-12):1087-94. PubMed ID: 16183254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The prediction of body composition in Chinese Australian females.
Lanham DA; Stead MA; Tsang K; Davies PS
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Feb; 25(2):286-91. PubMed ID: 11410833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Changes of body fat mass determined by be-electrical impedance and by anthropometry: BMI method and skinfolds method in overweight and obese women after implementation of low energy diet].
Pachocka L
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1999; 50(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 10789216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of body composition changes during weight loss in obese men using multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and multi-compartment models.
Johnstone AM; Faber P; Gibney ER; Lobley GE; Stubbs RJ; Siervo M
Obes Res Clin Pract; 2014; 8(1):e46-54. PubMed ID: 24548576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals.
Boneva-Asiova Z; Boyanov MA
Diabetes Obes Metab; 2008 Nov; 10(11):1012-8. PubMed ID: 18435776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Body composition in prepubertal girls: comparison of six methods.
Treuth MS; Butte NF; Wong WW; Ellis KJ
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1352-9. PubMed ID: 11571599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
