178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 132828)
1. [Importance of mechanical factors in the development of abdomial wound dehiscence. Tensile strength of the human and animal fascia with regard to various suture-materials].
Tauber R; Seidel W
Zentralbl Chir; 1975; 100(19):1178-82. PubMed ID: 132828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Suture technique and wound-bursting strength.
Poole GV; Meredith JW; Kon ND; Martin MB; Kawamoto EH; Myers RT
Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):569-72. PubMed ID: 6385792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Lead disc sutures in ruptured abdomen].
König R
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1970 Apr; 64(8):399-400. PubMed ID: 4255890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Development and prevention of abdominal wound dehisence].
Hentschel M; Mahjoub O
Chirurg; 1968 Aug; 39(8):356-60. PubMed ID: 4234442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT
Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial midline-fascia of the human abdominal wall for testing suture strength.
van Os JM; Lange JF; Goossens RH; Koster RP; Burger JW; Jeekel J; Kleinrensink GJ
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2006 Aug; 17(8):759-65. PubMed ID: 16897169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention mesh: an alternative to retention sutures.
Yüce K
Eur J Surg; 1994 Nov; 160(11):641-2. PubMed ID: 7858050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abdominal wound repair. An experimental study of the wound healing mechanism in the rabbit.
Nilsson T
Dan Med Bull; 1983 Nov; 30(6):394-407. PubMed ID: 6357647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressure necrosis is the primary cause of wound dehiscence.
Bartlett LC
Can J Surg; 1985 Jan; 28(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3882201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relative importance of Vicryl and Prolene sutures to the strength of healing abdominal wounds.
Nilsson T
Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(7):503-7. PubMed ID: 6213133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary abdominal wound closure with permanent, continuous running monofilament sutures.
Archie JP; Feldtman RW
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Nov; 153(5):721-2. PubMed ID: 7027500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of parallel versus perpendicular placement of retention sutures in abdominal wound closure.
Rappaport W; Allen R; Chvapil M; Benson D; Putnam C
Am Surg; 1990 Oct; 56(10):618-23. PubMed ID: 2221612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Closure of the abdominal wound with single-layer and double-layer technique. Animal studies.
Nilsson T
Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 6459705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Suture materials: the abdominal wall].
Damiani S; Compagno G; Scarpa G; Scalici F; Li Volsi F
Minerva Chir; 1992 Apr; 47(8):761-4. PubMed ID: 1534878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The causes of abdominal wound disruption.
Alexander HC; Prudden JF
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1966 Jun; 122(6):1223-9. PubMed ID: 5328836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominal wound dehiscence. A 10-year survey from a district general hospital.
White H; Cook J; Ward M
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1977 Jul; 59(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 141899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wound healing in abdominal operations.
Bucknall TE
Surg Annu; 1985; 17():1-22. PubMed ID: 3883538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparotomy closure.
Leaper DJ
Br J Hosp Med; 1985 Jun; 33(6):317-22. PubMed ID: 3160421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abdominal wound dehiscence.
Hugh TB
Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Mar; 60(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 2183750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
