These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13286434)

  • 1. Relationship between recognition accuracy and order of reporting stimulus dimensions.
    LAWRENCE DH; LABERGE DL
    J Exp Psychol; 1956 Jan; 51(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 13286434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multidimensional stimulus identification: instructing subjects in the order of reporting stimulus dimensions.
    Shieh KK; Lai CJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):995-1008. PubMed ID: 9172216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of order of report and stimulus type on multidimensional identification.
    Shieh KK; Chen FF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):783-94. PubMed ID: 12509176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of report order, identification method, and stimulus characteristics on multidimensional stimulus identification.
    Shieh KK; Lai CJ; Ellingstad VS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 8668508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations.
    Conway CM; Christiansen MH
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Oct; 17(10):905-12. PubMed ID: 17100792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Aug; 51(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 16039934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unsupervised category learning with integral-dimension stimuli.
    Ell SW; Ashby FG; Hutchinson S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1537-62. PubMed ID: 22506861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of recognition with alternatives before and after the stimulus.
    LAWRENCE DH; COLES GR
    J Exp Psychol; 1954 Mar; 47(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 13152297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Priming and stimulus-response learning in perceptual classification tasks.
    Soldan A; Clarke B; Colleran C; Kuras Y
    Memory; 2012; 20(4):400-13. PubMed ID: 22436079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional tradeoffs in the pigeon.
    Vyazovska OV; Teng Y; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):337-54. PubMed ID: 24634281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective attention and pigeons' multiple necessary cues discrimination learning.
    Teng Y; Vyazovska OV; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2015 Mar; 112():61-71. PubMed ID: 25150067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Releaser-induced recognition learning by gastropod molluscs.
    Suboski MD
    Behav Processes; 1992; 27(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24896463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Superior identification of familiar visual patterns a year after learning.
    Hussain Z; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):724-30. PubMed ID: 21586762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The nature and processes of preverbal learning: implications from nine-month-old infants' discrimination problem solving.
    Coldren JT; Colombo J
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1994; 59(4):1-75; discussion 76-93. PubMed ID: 7997251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid response learning of brand logo priming: Evidence that brand priming is not dominated by rapid response learning.
    Boehm SG; Smith C; Muench N; Noble K; Atherton C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1807-1816. PubMed ID: 28856966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning to recognize letters in the periphery: Effects of repeated exposure, letter frequency, and letter complexity.
    Husk JS; Yu D
    J Vis; 2017 Mar; 17(3):3. PubMed ID: 28265651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning pop-out detection: specificities to stimulus characteristics.
    Ahissar M; Hochstein S
    Vision Res; 1996 Nov; 36(21):3487-500. PubMed ID: 8977015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalization gradients and representation modes after absolute and relative discrimination learning in young chickens.
    Hauf P; Prior H; Sarris V
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18308484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dimensions of stimulus complexity.
    Fetterman JG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1996 Jan; 22(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 8568494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning to fear a second-order stimulus following vicarious learning.
    Reynolds G; Field AP; Askew C
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Apr; 31(3):572-579. PubMed ID: 26647800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.