432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1329051)
1. Quantitative DNA analysis and proliferation in breast carcinomas. A comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry.
Lee AK; Wiley B; Dugan JM; Hamilton WH; Loda M; Heatley GJ; Cook L; Silverman ML
Pathol Res Pract; 1992 Jun; 188(4-5):428-32. PubMed ID: 1329051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative DNA analysis in breast carcinomas: a comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry.
Lee AK; Dugan J; Hamilton WM; Cook L; Heatley G; Kamat B; Silverman ML
Mod Pathol; 1991 Mar; 4(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 2047381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma.
Chen TL; Luo I; Mikhail N; Rasková J; Raska K
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA ploidy, proliferation, and neu-oncogene protein overexpression in breast carcinoma.
Lee AK; Wiley B; Loda M; Bosari S; Dugan JM; Hamilton W; Heatley GJ; Cook L; Silverman ML
Mod Pathol; 1992 Jan; 5(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1347424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of proliferation activity in breast carcinoma by flow cytometry analysis of S-phase and quantitative analysis of MIB-1.
Masood S; Bui MM; Lu L
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1998; 28(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 9846198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative assessment of proliferation and DNA content in breast carcinoma by image analysis and flow cytometry.
Dawson AE; Norton JA; Weinberg DS
Am J Pathol; 1990 May; 136(5):1115-24. PubMed ID: 1972000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic significance of DNA image cytometry in Libyan breast cancer.
Ermiah E; Abdalla F; Buhmeida A; Alshrad M; Salem N; Pyrhönen S; Collan Y
Oncology; 2012; 83(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 22906963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carcinoma in situ of the female breast. A clinico-pathological, immunohistological, and DNA ploidy study.
Ottesen GL
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (108):1-67. PubMed ID: 12874968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer cell kinetics: immunocytochemical determination of growth fractions by monoclonal antibody Ki-67 and correlation with flow cytometric S-phase and with some features of tumor aggressiveness.
Gasparini G; Pozza F; Meli S; Reitano M; Santini G; Bevilacqua P
Anticancer Res; 1991; 11(6):2015-21. PubMed ID: 1776834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An image cytometric DNA-analysis in breast neoplasms. Parameters of DNA-aneuploidy and their relationship with conventional prognostic factors.
Longin A; Fontanière B; Pinzani V; Catimel G; Souchier C; Clavel M; Chauvin F
Pathol Res Pract; 1992 Jun; 188(4-5):466-72. PubMed ID: 1409073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative DNA analysis of breast cancer by flow cytometry and image analysis.
Borgiani L; Cogorno P; Toso F; Gallo L; Buccaran G; Rovida S; Canepa M
Pathologica; 1994 Aug; 86(4):356-9. PubMed ID: 7535909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationships between image cytometric DNA index, proliferation fraction and multiploidy and conventional nuclear grade in breast carcinoma.
Smith FB; Zappi ME
Mod Pathol; 1993 Sep; 6(5):606-11. PubMed ID: 7504261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic value of S-phase fraction in lymph-node-negative breast cancer by image and flow cytometric analysis.
Peiró G; Lerma E; Climent MA; Seguí MA; Alonso MC; Prat J
Mod Pathol; 1997 Mar; 10(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 9071729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image cytometry of aneuploidy, growth fraction (MoAb Ki-67) and hormone receptors (ER, PR) immunocytochemical assays in breast carcinomas.
Charpin C; Andrac L; Lavaut MN; Andonian C; Fraterno M; Devictor B; Perez-Castillo A; Bonnier P; Piana L
Anal Cell Pathol; 1990 Oct; 2(6):357-71. PubMed ID: 2275882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiparametric deoxyribonucleic acid and cell cycle analysis of breast carcinomas by flow cytometry. Clinicopathologic correlations.
Visscher DW; Zarbo RJ; Jacobsen G; Kambouris A; Talpos G; Sakr W; Crissman JD
Lab Invest; 1990 Mar; 62(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 1690316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flow cytometry vs. Ki67 labelling index in breast cancer: a prospective evaluation of 181 cases.
Martínez-Arribas F; Núñez MJ; Piqueras V; Lucas AR; Sánchez J; Tejerina A; Schneider J
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(1A):295-8. PubMed ID: 12017306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ploidy pattern and cell cycle in breast cancer as detected by image analysis and flow cytometry.
Luzi P; Bruni A; Mangiavacchi P; Cevenini G; Marini D; Tosi P
Cytometry; 1994 Jun; 18(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 7924702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of image analysis of imprints with flow cytometry for DNA analysis of solid tumors.
Claud RD; Weinstein RS; Howeedy A; Straus AK; Coon JS
Mod Pathol; 1989 Sep; 2(5):463-7. PubMed ID: 2813345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA image cytometry on sections as compared with image cytometry on smears and flow cytometry in melanoma.
Klapperstück T; Wohlrab W
Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 8875057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [DNA cytometry using paraffin embedded tumor tissues. Comparison of flow cytometry (FCM) and image cytometry (ICM)].
Baretton G; Blasenbreu S; Li X; DePascale T; Löhrs U
Zentralbl Pathol; 1994 Feb; 139(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 7512820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
