These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13292360)
21. [Studies on noise tolerance of the inner ear and its relation to certain psychosomatic symptoms]. NESSWETHA W Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1956 Mar; 35(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 13325733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Aural traumatism & the middle ear]. ROBERT P; BURGEAT P; VERTUT J Med Aeronaut; 1957; 12(4):353-5. PubMed ID: 13515778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. USE OF NOISE TO ELIMINATE ONE EAR FROM MASKING EXPERIMENTS. WESTON PB; MILLER JD J Acoust Soc Am; 1965 Apr; 37():638-46. PubMed ID: 14288278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. CRITERIA FOR HEARING CONSERVATION IN NOISE. GLORIG A Trans Pac Coast Otoophthalmol Soc Annu Meet; 1964; 45():137-59. PubMed ID: 14269921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Temporary changes in acuity of the human ear following exposure to intense noise. GALLAGHER JB; GOODWIN JE AMA Arch Ind Hyg Occup Med; 1952 Oct; 6(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 12984844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Does drill noise during mastoid surgery affect the contralateral ear? Man A; Winerman I Am J Otol; 1985 Jul; 6(4):334-5. PubMed ID: 4025532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Noise from turbine drill. Risk for hearing injuries among dentists?]. Hundseth T; Moe PO; Lund O Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1973 May; 83(5):185-7. PubMed ID: 4584362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Objective and Subjective Improvement of Hearing in Noise After Surgical Correction of Unilateral Congenital Aural Atresia in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Study Using the Hearing in Noise Test, the Sound-Spatial-Quality Questionnaire, and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Byun H; Moon IJ; Woo SY; Jin SH; Park H; Chung WH; Hong SH; Cho YS Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):e183-9. PubMed ID: 25695924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Electrolytes and noise susceptibility. COOK N AMA Arch Otolaryngol; 1952 Oct; 56(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 12984925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Forward. The art of hearing conservation. Murphy WJ; Griest SE Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53 Suppl 2():S2-4. PubMed ID: 24564689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. NOISE and conservation of hearing. Tech Bull Dep Army; 1956 May; (251):1-6. PubMed ID: 13343888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [The frequency differential threshold: the effect of the simultaneous presence of a sound or a white noise on the opposite ear]. CHOCHOLLE R; SAULNIER C J Physiol (Paris); 1962; 54():315-6. PubMed ID: 13879102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Protective devices in a hearing conservation program. The rationale and justification of personal hearing protectors. Gosztonyi RE J Occup Med; 1975 Nov; 17(11):731-3. PubMed ID: 1195035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. EAST RANGE SYMPOSIUM. I. HEARING LOSS: DIAGNOSIS AND ANATOMIC CONSIDERATIONS. HOLMBERG CJ J Occup Med; 1965 Apr; 7():138-44. PubMed ID: 14271351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Noise-induced hearing loss. Catlin FI Am J Otol; 1986 Mar; 7(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 2938482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]