181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1330268)
1. A validation of a physical activity monitor for young and older adults.
Nichols JF; Patterson P; Early T
Can J Sport Sci; 1992 Dec; 17(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 1330268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry.
Haymes EM; Byrnes WC
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Dec; 25(12):1365-9. PubMed ID: 8107543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output.
Yngve A; Nilsson A; Sjostrom M; Ekelund U
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Feb; 35(2):320-6. PubMed ID: 12569223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of energy expenditure for physical activity using a triaxial accelerometer.
Bouten CV; Westerterp KR; Verduin M; Janssen JD
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Dec; 26(12):1516-23. PubMed ID: 7869887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry.
Kumahara H; Schutz Y; Ayabe M; Yoshioka M; Yoshitake Y; Shindo M; Ishii K; Tanaka H
Br J Nutr; 2004 Feb; 91(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 14756909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Caltrac versus calorimeter determination of 24-h energy expenditure in female children and adolescents.
Bray MS; Wong WW; Morrow JR; Butte NF; Pivarnik JM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Dec; 26(12):1524-30. PubMed ID: 7869888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of activity in older adults: reliability and validity of the Step Activity Monitor.
Resnick B; Nahm ES; Orwig D; Zimmerman SS; Magaziner J
J Nurs Meas; 2001; 9(3):275-90. PubMed ID: 11881269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of low-intensity physical activity by triaxial accelerometry.
Midorikawa T; Tanaka S; Kaneko K; Koizumi K; Ishikawa-Takata K; Futami J; Tabata I
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2007 Dec; 15(12):3031-8. PubMed ID: 18198312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a wearable body monitoring device during treadmill walking and jogging in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.
Munguía-Izquierdo D; Santalla A; Legaz-Arrese A
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jan; 93(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 22200390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children.
Puyau MR; Adolph AL; Vohra FA; Butte NF
Obes Res; 2002 Mar; 10(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 11886937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions.
Le Masurier GC; Tudor-Locke C
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):867-71. PubMed ID: 12750599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gait speed and step-count monitor accuracy in community-dwelling older adults.
Storti KL; Pettee KK; Brach JS; Talkowski JB; Richardson CR; Kriska AM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Jan; 40(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18091020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tracmor system for measuring walking energy expenditure.
Levine J; Melanson EL; Westerterp KR; Hill JO
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Sep; 57(9):1176-80. PubMed ID: 12947439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Precision and accuracy of an ankle-worn accelerometer-based pedometer in step counting and energy expenditure.
Foster RC; Lanningham-Foster LM; Manohar C; McCrady SK; Nysse LJ; Kaufman KR; Padgett DJ; Levine JA
Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):778-83. PubMed ID: 16125760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Habitual physical activity differentially affects acute and short-term energy intake regulation in young and older adults.
Van Walleghen EL; Orr JS; Gentile CL; Davy KP; Davy BM
Int J Obes (Lond); 2007 Aug; 31(8):1277-85. PubMed ID: 17342074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ability of different physical activity monitors to detect movement during treadmill walking.
Leenders NY; Nelson TE; Sherman WM
Int J Sports Med; 2003 Jan; 24(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 12582951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of the Nike+ device during walking and running.
Kane NA; Simmons MC; John D; Thompson DL; Bassett DR
Int J Sports Med; 2010 Feb; 31(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 20027538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a commercial accelerometer (Tritrac-R3 D) to measure energy expenditure during ambulation.
Sherman WM; Morris DM; Kirby TE; Petosa RA; Smith BA; Frid DJ; Leenders N
Int J Sports Med; 1998 Jan; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 9506799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An artificial neural network model of energy expenditure using nonintegrated acceleration signals.
Rothney MP; Neumann M; Béziat A; Chen KY
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2007 Oct; 103(4):1419-27. PubMed ID: 17641221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laboratory calibration and validation of the Biotrainer and Actitrac activity monitors.
Welk GJ; Almeida J; Morss G
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Jun; 35(6):1057-64. PubMed ID: 12783056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
