These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13303709)

  • 21. The relation of auditory response to the viscosity of tympanic fluids.
    GOODHILL V; HOLCOMB AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1958; 49(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 13508216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of the tympanic muscle reflexes upon sound transmission.
    WEVER EG; VERNON JA
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1955; 45(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 13275310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Impact of a Cochlear Implant Electrode Array on the Middle Ear Transfer Function.
    Pazen D; Anagiotos A; Nünning M; Gostian AO; Ortmann M; Beutner D
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e241-e255. PubMed ID: 28207578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Response of the middle ear muscles to audiometric stimulation].
    BERLENDIS PA
    Arch Ital Otol Rinol Laringol Suppl; 1955; 19(Suppl.):1-100. PubMed ID: 14377826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of static force on round window stimulation with the direct acoustic cochlea stimulator.
    Maier H; Salcher R; Schwab B; Lenarz T
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():115-24. PubMed ID: 23276731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The round window electromagnetic implantable hearing aid approach.
    Spindel JH; Lambert PR; Ruth RA
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 7739865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Changes in the auditory threshold for air and bone conduction in relation to middle ear pressure in probands with normal hearing].
    Maier W; Ross UH
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):525-30. PubMed ID: 7495432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: long-term follow-up.
    Henseler MA; Polanski JF; Schlegel C; Linder T
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 24492140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The round window membrane under normal and pathological conditions.
    Goycoolea MV
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1992; 493():43-55. PubMed ID: 1636422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laser Doppler vibrometric assessment of middle ear motion in Thiel-embalmed heads.
    Stieger C; Candreia C; Kompis M; Herrmann G; Pfiffner F; Widmer D; Arnold A
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 22377645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is the Bone-Conduction HeadBand test useful for predicting the functional outcome of a round window active middle ear implant?
    Monini S; Filippi C; Atturo F; Barbara M
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1329-35. PubMed ID: 23867342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The mechanism of direct stimulation of the cochlea by vibrating the round window.
    Perez R; Adelman C; Chordekar S; de Jong MA; Sohmer H
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2014 Sep; 25(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 25046313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A and Haemophilus influenzae type b endotoxin. Effect on the inner ear and passage through the round window membrane of the chinchilla.
    Lundman L; Bagger-Sjöbäck D; Juhn SK; Morizono T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1992; 493():69-76. PubMed ID: 1636425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Audiometric demonstrations of nonacoustic-induced reflex contractions of the intra-aural muscles.
    PICHLER H; BORNSCHEIN H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1957; 48(5-6):498-503. PubMed ID: 13508206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors improving the vibration transfer of the floating mass transducer at the round window.
    Arnold A; Stieger C; Candreia C; Pfiffner F; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jan; 31(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 19887971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of auditory responses determined by acoustic stimulation and by mechanical round window stimulation at equivalent stapes velocities.
    Lee J; Seong K; Lee SH; Lee KY; Cho JH
    Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 314():65-71. PubMed ID: 24768763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Vibrant soundbridge implantation of congenital atresia of oval window(with summary of nine cases].
    Wang DN; Zhao SQ; Li Y; Ma XB; Ren R; Chen XQ; Li YL
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 31(8):588-589. PubMed ID: 29871320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transmission of change in the atmospheric pressure of the external ear to the perilymph.
    Nishihara S; Gyo K; Yanagihara N
    Am J Otol; 1992 Jul; 13(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 1415502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modelling the effect of round window stiffness on residual hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Elliott SJ; Ni G; Verschuur CA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():155-167. PubMed ID: 27586580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Round window versus promontory stimulation: assessment for cochlear implant candidacy.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Nov; 100(11):889-92. PubMed ID: 1746821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.