These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1331187)

  • 1. A prospective comparative study of transvaginal ultrasonography and digital examination for cervical assessment in the third trimester of pregnancy.
    Lim BH; Mahmood TA; Smith NC; Beat I
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1992; 20(9):599-603. PubMed ID: 1331187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Transvaginal ultrasound in evaluation of the uterine cervix during pregnancy].
    Klejewski A; Urbaniak T; Brazert J; Drews K
    Ginekol Pol; 1994 Aug; 65(8):430-4. PubMed ID: 7721150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
    Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction.
    Tanir HM; Sener T; Yildiz Z
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 100(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 17920604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of transvaginal cervical length measurements and quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix in the second and third trimester of pregnancy.
    Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Schmidt S; Tekesin I
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E169-74. PubMed ID: 21630183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between detection of the cervical gland area during the late third trimester and necessity for induction of labor to prevent post-term delivery.
    Minami Y; Sekiya T; Nishizawa H; Miyazaki J; Noda Y; Ishii R; Yasue A; Nishio E; Udagawa Y; Fujii T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2014 Oct; 41(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 27278027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix before labor: presence of cervical wedging is associated with shorter duration of induced labor.
    Boozarjomehri F; Timor-Tritsch I; Chao CR; Fox HE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1081-7. PubMed ID: 7943075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of cervical changes before onset of labor].
    Liu X; Yang J; Bian X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Oct; 33(10):588-90. PubMed ID: 10806681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay.
    Reis FM; Gervasi MT; Florio P; Bracalente G; Fadalti M; Severi FM; Petraglia F
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Nov; 189(5):1361-7. PubMed ID: 14634569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
    Valentin L; Bergelin I
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 12230448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Translabial ultrasound of the third-trimester uterine cervix. Correlation with digital examination.
    Mahony BS; Nyberg DA; Luthy DA; Hirsch JH; Hickok DE; Petty CN
    J Ultrasound Med; 1990 Dec; 9(12):717-23. PubMed ID: 2277401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the upper uterine cervix by the location of the vesicocervical fold of the urinary bladder to rule out cervical shortening during pregnancy with and without premature contractions.
    Shalev J; Meizner I; Orvieto R; Mashiach R; Vardimon D; Hod M; Ben-Rafael Z
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 13(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 10423803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical changes in twin pregnancies observed by transvaginal ultrasound during the latter half of pregnancy: a longitudinal, observational study.
    Bergelin I; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 12808672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital examination and transperineal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length to assess risk of preterm delivery.
    Onderoğlu LS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Dec; 59(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 9486511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the cervix in the third trimester of pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound scanning.
    Lazanakis M; Marsh M; Brockbank E; Economides D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2002 Oct; 105(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 12270561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical length measurement by transvaginal sonography in preterm pregnant women for prediction of preterm birth.
    Kwasan S; Paisarntuntiwong R; Charoenchainont P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S48-55. PubMed ID: 17722317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound of the cervix during pregnancy.
    Mahony BS
    Abdom Imaging; 1997; 22(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 9321441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A longitudinal study of the cervix in pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound.
    Cook CM; Ellwood DA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Jan; 103(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 8608091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The correlation between transperineal sonography and digital examination in the evaluation of the third-trimester cervix.
    Richey SD; Ramin KD; Roberts SW; Ramin SM; Cox SM; Twickler DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 85(5 Pt 1):745-8. PubMed ID: 7724106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques.
    Carr DB; Smith K; Parsons L; Chansky K; Shields LE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 96(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 11004358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.