These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1331431)

  • 1. Efficacy of a porcelain refinishing system in restoring surface finish after grinding with fine and extra-fine diamond burs.
    Patterson CJ; McLundie AC; Stirrups DR; Taylor WG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Sep; 68(3):402-6. PubMed ID: 1331431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refinishing of porcelain by using a refinishing kit.
    Patterson CJ; McLundie AC; Stirrups DR; Taylor WG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Mar; 65(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 1647456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic.
    Mohammadibassir M; Rezvani MB; Golzari H; Moravej Salehi E; Fahimi MA; Kharazi Fard MJ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e172-e180. PubMed ID: 28273681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postadjustment polishing of CAD-CAM ceramic with luminescence diamond gel.
    Finger WJ; Noack MD
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 11763906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cracking of porcelain surfaces arising from abrasive grinding with a dental air turbine.
    Chang CW; Waddell JN; Lyons KM; Swain MV
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Dec; 20(8):613-20. PubMed ID: 22017480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain.
    Wright MD; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E; Thompson GA; Runyan DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 15523338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer.
    Tholt de Vasconcellos B; Miranda-Júnior WG; Prioli R; Thompson J; Oda M
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 16924984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scanning electron microscopy and profilometer evaluation of glazed and polished dental porcelain.
    Fuzzi M; Zaccheroni Z; Vallania G
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(5):452-8. PubMed ID: 9108746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations.
    Maresca C; Pimenta LA; Heymann HO; Ziemiecki TL; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 20433561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Micro-morphometric assessment of titanium plasma-sprayed coating removal using burs for the treatment of peri-implant disease.
    Rimondini L; Cicognani Simoncini F; Carrassi A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11168203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Damage tolerance of indirect restorative materials (including PICN) after simulated bur adjustments.
    Coldea A; Fischer J; Swain MV; Thiel N
    Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):684-94. PubMed ID: 25858782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials.
    Scurria MS; Powers JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Feb; 71(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 8126673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of fluoride and 10% carbamide peroxide on the surface roughness of low-fusing and ultra low-fusing porcelain.
    Butler CJ; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Thompson GA; Runyan DA; Anthony von Fraunhofer J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 15295328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro study to identify a ceramic polishing protocol effecting smoothness superior to glazed surface.
    Manjuran NG; Sreelal T
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Sep; 14(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 25183905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of 2 polishing techniques and reglazing on the surface roughness of dental porcelain.
    Schneider J; Dias Frota BM; Passos VF; Santiago SL; Freitas Pontes KM
    Gen Dent; 2013; 61(7):e6-9. PubMed ID: 24192749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface roughness of resin composite prepared by single-use and multi-use diamonds.
    Roeder LB; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15151337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics.
    Ahmad R; Morgano SM; Wu BM; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 16275301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Examination of the mechanical properties of zirconia and porcelain blocks after grinding with smooth and coarse diamond burrs].
    Shemer S; Hendler A; Pilo R; Weiss E; Perez-Davidi M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2014 Apr; 31(2):31-9, 87. PubMed ID: 25252469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Atomic force microscopy analysis of enamel nanotopography after interproximal reduction.
    Meredith L; Farella M; Lowrey S; Cannon RD; Mei L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Apr; 151(4):750-757. PubMed ID: 28364899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.