109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1331812)
1. Safeguards added for appeals in misconduct cases.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6401):202. PubMed ID: 1331812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific fraud and misconduct.
Klein DF
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 11(6):337-8. PubMed ID: 1663134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Fed Regist; 2005 May; 70(94):28369-400. PubMed ID: 15898182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Animal welfare and scientific misconduct: reviewing, investigating, and reporting violations and concerns.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2002 May; 31(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11984546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
Mosimann JE
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.
Pascal CB
Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
Scheetz MD
Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
Redman BK; Merz JF
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
Price AR
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
Reynolds GH
Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Wanted: Fraud-buster with political antennae.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2014 Mar; 507(7492):275. PubMed ID: 24646961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity.
Needleman HL
Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft responses to misconduct.
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):253. PubMed ID: 12447400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Defining research misconduct: will we know it when we see it?
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 11478122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
Dalton R
Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
Price AR
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Second guessing. Is more oversight needed to curb scientific cheating?
Beardsley T
Sci Am; 1991 Jun; 264(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 1650032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bill would force journals to follow misconduct rules.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 May; 357(6373):7. PubMed ID: 1315423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
