These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13319611)
1. Effects of stimulus similarity on discrimination learning. SPIKER CC J Exp Psychol; 1956 Jun; 51(6):393-5. PubMed ID: 13319611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stimulus generalization as a function of discrimination learning with and without errors. Lyons J Science; 1969 Jan; 163(3866):490-1. PubMed ID: 5762403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variables in early discrimination learning. II. Mode of response and stimulus difference in the discrimination of tonal frequencies. JEFFREY WE Child Dev; 1958 Dec; 29(4):531-8. PubMed ID: 13597074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrimination and stimulus generalization of approach, of avoidance, and of approach and avoidance during conflict. HOFFMAN HS; FLESHLER M J Exp Psychol; 1963 Mar; 65():280-91. PubMed ID: 13963927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. DISCRETE STIMULUS CLASSES AS AN APPROACH TO PSYCHOLOGICAL SIMILARITY. MARSTON AR J Gen Psychol; 1964 Jan; 70():75-83. PubMed ID: 14115840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of stimulus comparison on discrimination learning and transposition. RILEY DA; RING K; THOMAS J J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1960 Oct; 53():415-21. PubMed ID: 13741676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary stimulus generalization in discrimination learning as a function of numbers of trials and incidental cue differences. WALDER LO J Exp Psychol; 1961 Feb; 61():178-85. PubMed ID: 13782645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Discrimination learning with vertical vs. horizontal stimulus relationships. MILLER RE; MURPHY JV J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1956 Feb; 49(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 13295413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal contiguity of stimulus and response in simultaneous-discrimination learning. RIOPELLE AJ; SHELL WF J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1960 Dec; 53():590-3. PubMed ID: 13741798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Transfer from verbal-discrimination to paired-associate learning: II. Effects of intralist similarity, method, and percentage occurrence of response members. BATTIG WF; BRACKETT HR J Exp Psychol; 1963 May; 65():507-14. PubMed ID: 13966855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cue and contextual stimulus intensity in discrimination learning. NYGAARD JE J Exp Psychol; 1958 Feb; 55(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 13513936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The stimulus trace gradient in visual discrimination learning. SMITH MP J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1951 Apr; 44(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 14873837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a relevant observation stimulus on human discrimination learning as a function of position of the relevant stimulus. SIMON SH Percept Mot Skills; 1962 Oct; 15():359-65. PubMed ID: 13977498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]