These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1337832)
1. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Gribbestad IS; Nilsen G; Fjøsne H; Fougner R; Haugen OA; Petersen SB; Rinck PA; Kvinnsland S Acta Oncol; 1992; 31(8):833-42. PubMed ID: 1337832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography. Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS. Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI? Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast carcinomas with strong high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: pathological characteristics and differential diagnosis. Yuen S; Uematsu T; Kasami M; Tanaka K; Kimura K; Sanuki J; Uchida Y; Furukawa H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 17326093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer in dense breast: detection with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. Kawashima H; Matsui O; Suzuki M; Kadoya M; Tawara M; Nonomura A; Noguchi M; Takashima T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Mar; 11(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 10739554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging of the human female breast. Current status and pathologic correlations. Powell DE; Stelling CB Pathol Annu; 1988; 23 Pt 1():159-94. PubMed ID: 2838793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer]. Meladze NV; Ternovoĭ SK; Sharia MA; Solopova AE Ter Arkh; 2013; 85(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 23808288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Subtraction and dynamic MR images of breast cancer]. Murakami Y; Aoki M; Harada J Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Apr; 53(4):375-86. PubMed ID: 8493070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI of the breast as part of the assessment in population-based mammography screening. Bick U; Engelken F; Diederichs G; Dzyuballa R; Ortmann M; Fallenberg EM Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):849-56. PubMed ID: 23740312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging contrast-enhanced relaxometry of breast tumors: an MRI multicenter investigation concerning 100 patients. Eliat PA; Dedieu V; Bertino C; Bouté V; Lacroix J; Constans JM; de Korvin B; Vincent C; Bailly C; Joffre F; de Certaines J; Vincensini D Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 May; 22(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 15120166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma. Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the differentiation of breast tumors: user-defined versus semi-automated region-of-interest analysis. Liney GP; Gibbs P; Hayes C; Leach MO; Turnbull LW J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Dec; 10(6):945-9. PubMed ID: 10581507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Enhanced MRI of breast cancer smaller than 3 cm]. Ikeda Y; Narabayashi I; Yoshida S; Motohara T; Koizumi T; Ogawa K; Mieda C; Ueda E; Hirota S; Oshitani T Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Nov; 51(11):1314-23. PubMed ID: 1662800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography in the measurement of ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparison with histopathology. Pickles MD; Gibbs P; Hubbard A; Rahman A; Wieczorek J; Turnbull LW Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):603-10. PubMed ID: 25604907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of imaging and pathology features of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Zhang L; Jia N; Han L; Yang L; Xu W; Chen W Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15(2):e147-54. PubMed ID: 25523373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Kerslake RW; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Imrie MJ; Cook AM; Read JR; Bowsley SJ; Buckley DL; Horsman A Clin Radiol; 1995 Jul; 50(7):440-54. PubMed ID: 7614789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benign and malignant breast disease: magnetic resonance and radiofrequency pulse sequences. el Yousef SJ; O'Connell DM; Duchesneau RH; Smith MJ; Hubay CA; Guyton SP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jul; 145(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 2988320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]