108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1338567)
1. A processing strategy for automated Papanicolaou smear screening.
Lee JS; Bannister WI; Kuan LC; Bartels PH; Nelson AC
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1992 Oct; 14(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 1338567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated prescreening of conventionally prepared cervical smears: a feasibility study.
Bartoo GT; Lee JS; Bartels PH; Kiviat NB; Nelson AC
Lab Invest; 1992 Jan; 66(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 1731146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images.
William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Feb; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 30755214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic analysis of Papanicolaou smears by digital image processing.
Stenkvist B; Bergström R; Brinne U; Hesselius I; Kiviranta A; Nordgren H; Schnürer L; Stendahl U; Sténson S; Söderström J
Gynecol Oncol; 1987 May; 27(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 3570043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated Papanicolaou smear analysis as a screening tool for female lower genital tract malignancies.
Ku NN
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 11(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 10047962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated rescreening in cervical cytology. Mathematical models for evaluating overall process sensitivity, specificity and cost.
Kaminsky FC; Benneyan JC; Mullins DL
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):209-23. PubMed ID: 9022745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Papanicolaou smear: can we make a good test better? Technical and interpretive challenges for the practitioner.
Eltabbakh GH; Eltabbakh GD
J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 1999 May; 8(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 10839701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Classification of cytological smears of the cervix with neuronal methods].
Kestler HA; Schulé M; Schwenker F; Neumann H; Mattfeldt T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1999; 44(1-2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10194881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stanley F. Patten, Jr., M.D., Ph.D. and the development of an automated Papanicolaou smear screening system.
Lee JS; Nelson AC
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):332-6. PubMed ID: 9438457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Automation of the Papanicolaou smear: a technology assessment perspective.
Linder J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 9111119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated screening of cervical cytology specimens.
Birdsong GG
Hum Pathol; 1996 May; 27(5):468-81. PubMed ID: 8621186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Debris removal in Pap-smear images.
Malm P; Balakrishnan BN; Sujathan VK; Kumar R; Bengtsson E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jul; 111(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 23582663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CytoView. A prototype computer image-based Papanicolaou smear proficiency test.
Taylor RN; Gagnon M; Lange J; Lee T; Draut R; Kujawski E
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(6):1045-51. PubMed ID: 10578977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data cluster analysis-based classification of overlapping nuclei in Pap smear samples.
Guven M; Cengizler C
Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Dec; 13():159. PubMed ID: 25487072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Papanicolaou-stained cytological smear as a screening technique for asymptomatic gonorrhoea.
Genvert GI; Drusin LM; Seybolt JF; Braun DW
Br J Vener Dis; 1980 Dec; 56(6):400-3. PubMed ID: 7004568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Understanding the financial impact of covering new screening technologies. The case of automated Pap smears.
McQuarrie HG; Ogden J; Costa M
J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):898-906. PubMed ID: 11127101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automation in cervical cytology: an overview.
Banda-Gamboa H; Ricketts I; Cairns A; Hussein K; Tucker JH; Husain N
Anal Cell Pathol; 1992 Jan; 4(1):25-48. PubMed ID: 1734941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis from Pap smear images.
Momenzadeh M; Sehhati M; Mehri Dehnavi A; Talebi A; Rabbani H
J Microsc; 2017 Sep; 267(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 28419509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three different methods for automated classification of cervical cells.
Palcic B; MacAulay C; Shlien S; Treurniet W; Tezcan H; Anderson G
Anal Cell Pathol; 1992 Nov; 4(6):429-41. PubMed ID: 1280993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semi-automated cervical smear pre-screening systems: an evaluation of the Cytoscan-110.
Husain OA; Watts KC; Lorriman F; Butler B; Tucker J; Carothers A; Eason P; Farrow S; Rutovitz D; Stark M
Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 Jan; 5(1):49-68. PubMed ID: 8424901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
