These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1339803)

  • 1. [Echocardiographic assessment for surgical treatment in patients with aortic stenosis].
    Ota T; Iwahashi K; Kanda H; Sato H; Okada M; Nakamura K
    J Cardiol; 1992; 22(2-3):447-55. PubMed ID: 1339803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Severity of aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler techniques].
    Nakamura K; Shiina T; Satomi G; Sakai K; Tamura K; Matsumura K; Umemura J; Magosaki N; Koyanagi H; Hirosawa K
    J Cardiol; 1987 Dec; 17(4):807-16. PubMed ID: 3333519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The 19mm St. Jude Medical prosthetic aortic valve evaluated by long-term hemodynamic sequelae].
    Oka K; Hadama T; Takasaki H; Mori Y; Shigemitsu O; Shirabe J
    J Cardiol; 1990; 20(4):917-28. PubMed ID: 2133726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography].
    Schmalz A; Erbel R; Wittlich N; Mohr-Kahaly S; Meyer J
    Z Kardiol; 1992 Nov; 81(11):619-26. PubMed ID: 1471399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correction of Doppler Gradients for Pressure Recovery Improves Agreement with Subsequent Catheterization Gradients in Congenital Aortic Stenosis.
    Schlingmann TR; Gauvreau K; Colan SD; Powell AJ
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Dec; 28(12):1410-7. PubMed ID: 26454341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relative contribution of prosthetic gradients, systemic arterial pressure, and pulse pressure to the left ventricular pressure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves.
    Bech-Hanssen O; Aljassim O; Houltz E; Svensson G
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2011 Jan; 12(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 20813790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How important is the impact of pressure recovery on routine evaluation of aortic stenosis? A clinical study in 91 patients.
    Isaaz K; Gaillard O; Cerisier A; Da Costa A; Faure E; Lamaud M; Gerenton C
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 15222280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of aortic stenosis in mechanically ventilated patients using multiplane transesophageal Doppler echocardiography.
    Blumberg FC; Pfeifer M; Holmer SR; Kromer EP; Riegger GA; Elsner D
    Chest; 1998 Jul; 114(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 9674453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quantitative evaluation of aortic stenosis using continuous wave Doppler].
    Zhu WL
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 1989 Feb; 17(1):7-9, 61. PubMed ID: 2766948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of incoordination on left ventricular force-velocity relation in aortic stenosis.
    Jin XY; Pepper JR; Gibson DG
    Heart; 1996 Dec; 76(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 9014797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left ventricular mass regression is independent of gradient drop and effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement with a porcine bioprosthesis.
    Sádaba JR; Herregods MC; Bogaert J; Harringer W; Gerosa G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 23409363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Catheterization-Doppler discrepancies in nonsimultaneous evaluations of aortic stenosis.
    Aghassi P; Aurigemma GP; Folland ED; Tighe DA
    Echocardiography; 2005 May; 22(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 15901286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pressure gradients across bileaflet aortic valves by direct measurement and echocardiography.
    Laske A; Jenni R; Maloigne M; Vassalli G; Bertel O; Turina MI
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Jan; 61(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 8561632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Left intraventricular dynamic gradients in the follow-up of aortic valve replacement: an echo-Doppler study].
    Laurent M; Varin C; Pasquali V; Schleich JM; Bédossa M; Le Helloco A; Almange C
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Apr; 86(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 8239875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuing dilemmas concerning aortic valve replacement in patients with advanced left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
    Green GR; Miller DC
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Nov; 6(6):562-79. PubMed ID: 9427121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The value of Doppler echocardiography findings in selecting patients with aortic stenosis for surgical intervention].
    Punzengruber C; Gilhofer R; Pachinger O
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1989 Mar; 101(6):204-8. PubMed ID: 2711694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of invasive and noninvasive assessment of aortic stenosis severity in the elderly.
    Gertz ZM; Raina A; O'Donnell W; McCauley BD; Shellenberger C; Kolansky DM; Wilensky RL; Forfia PR; Herrmann HC
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jun; 5(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 22647520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis.
    Minners J; Allgeier M; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Kienzle RP; Neumann FJ; Jander N
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Apr; 29(8):1043-8. PubMed ID: 18156619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of aortic stenosis: the role of pressure recovery evaluated 'in vivo'.
    Razzolini R; Manica A; Tarantini G; Ramondo A; Napodano M; Iliceto S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 May; 16(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17578039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical and echocardiographic evaluation of the Medtronic-Hall 20A valve in the aortic position in patients with small aortic annulus: comparison with the 21 mmSJM valve].
    Sasaki Y; Suehiro S; Shibata T; Fujioka M; Hattori K; Kumano H; Hosono K; Kinoshita H
    Kyobu Geka; 1997 Sep; 50(10):819-23, discussion 823-5. PubMed ID: 9301174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.