These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1341697)
1. The effect of finishing techniques on marginal adaption and surface morphology of three glass ionomer cements. Naguib EA; Carlson TJ J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1992; 71(6):20-2. PubMed ID: 1341697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [SEM study on the finishing of glass ionomer cement filling surfaces]. Hannig M; Rahlf B Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Mar; 46(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 1814729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A study of different polishing techniques for amalgams and glass-cermet cement by scanning electron microscope (SEM)]. Kakaboura A; Vougiouklakis G; Argiri G Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 2518600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A pilot study of the marginal adaptation and surface morphology of glass-cermet cements. Chu CH; King NM; Lee AM; Yiu CK; Wei SH Quintessence Int; 1996 Jul; 27(7):493-501. PubMed ID: 8941827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of lubrication on the temperature rise and surface finish of glass-ionomer cements. Jones CS; Billington RW; Pearson GJ J Dent; 2006 Sep; 34(8):602-7. PubMed ID: 16530913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations. Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class 5 restorative materials. Hondrum SO; Fernández R Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 9227125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing. St Germain HA; Meiers JC Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of Class 2 glass-ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars. Fuks AB; Holan G; Simon H; Lewinstein I Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 1437689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing systems. Yap AU; Tan WS; Yeo JC; Yap WY; Ong SB Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 12120776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients. Wood RE; Maxymiw WG; McComb D Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro assessment of cavity margin finishing and marginal adaptation of tunnel restorations. Chalker SA; Lumley PJ Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Jun; 1(4):151-6. PubMed ID: 8268839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]