These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1341697)

  • 1. The effect of finishing techniques on marginal adaption and surface morphology of three glass ionomer cements.
    Naguib EA; Carlson TJ
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1992; 71(6):20-2. PubMed ID: 1341697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [SEM study on the finishing of glass ionomer cement filling surfaces].
    Hannig M; Rahlf B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Mar; 46(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 1814729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A study of different polishing techniques for amalgams and glass-cermet cement by scanning electron microscope (SEM)].
    Kakaboura A; Vougiouklakis G; Argiri G
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 2518600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A pilot study of the marginal adaptation and surface morphology of glass-cermet cements.
    Chu CH; King NM; Lee AM; Yiu CK; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jul; 27(7):493-501. PubMed ID: 8941827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of lubrication on the temperature rise and surface finish of glass-ionomer cements.
    Jones CS; Billington RW; Pearson GJ
    J Dent; 2006 Sep; 34(8):602-7. PubMed ID: 16530913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class 5 restorative materials.
    Hondrum SO; Fernández R
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 9227125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of Class 2 glass-ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars.
    Fuks AB; Holan G; Simon H; Lewinstein I
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 1437689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing systems.
    Yap AU; Tan WS; Yeo JC; Yap WY; Ong SB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 12120776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients.
    Wood RE; Maxymiw WG; McComb D
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro assessment of cavity margin finishing and marginal adaptation of tunnel restorations.
    Chalker SA; Lumley PJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Jun; 1(4):151-6. PubMed ID: 8268839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finishing of glass-ionomer cements.
    Pearson GJ
    Dent Update; 1991 Dec; 18(10):424-8. PubMed ID: 1843817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finishing and polishing glass-ionomer cements.
    Eide R; Tveit AB
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 2126906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers.
    Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8957918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tunnel restorations using glass ionomer or glass cermet: in vitro marginal ridge fracture and microleakage.
    Shetty R; Munshi AK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 9161212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing time.
    Yap AU; Ong SB; Yap WY; Tan WS; Yeo JC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):462-7. PubMed ID: 12216564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal ridge fracture resistance, microleakage and pulpal response to glass ionomer/glass cermet partial tunnel restorations.
    Prabhu NT; Munshi AK; Shetty TR
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9484134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.