These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1343343)

  • 1. Updates in dental materials--Part 1: Dental composites.
    Ray NJ
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 1992; 38(2):5-11. PubMed ID: 1343343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Updates in dental materials--Part 2: Resin cements.
    Ray NJ
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 1993; 39(2):30-2. PubMed ID: 8301161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Updates in dental materials--Part 4. Ceramic materials.
    Ray NJ
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 1993; 39(4):89-92. PubMed ID: 8006473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Updates in dental materials--Part 3: Dental amalgams.
    Ray NJ
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 1993; 39(3):64-8. PubMed ID: 9120343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of a filled adhesive on bond strength in three dentinal bonding systems.
    Fanning DE; Wakefield CW; Robbins JW; Bagley AL
    Gen Dent; 1995; 43(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 8940582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of microleakage below cemento-enamel junction using light cure and chemically cured glass ionomer cement liners.
    Gupta S; Khinda VI; Grewal N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Dec; 20(4):158-64. PubMed ID: 12587752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of the XR bonding system on microleakage.
    Swift EJ; Hansen SE; Bailey SJ
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 2150171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on wear resistance of luting agents.
    Shinkai K; Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF; Katoh Y
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):767-71. PubMed ID: 7568681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Part 1: Properties.
    Sidhu SK; Watson TF
    Dent Update; 1995 Dec; 22(10):429-32. PubMed ID: 8948190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adhesion and tooth-colored restoratives.
    Duke ES
    Curr Opin Dent; 1991 Apr; 1(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 1777661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adhesion of composites to dentin and enamel.
    Bowen RL; Marjenhoff WA
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1993 Jun; 21(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 7692003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Wang L; Sakai VT; Kawai ES; Buzalaf MA; Atta MT
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16457670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry.
    Sidhu SK; Watson TF
    Am J Dent; 1995 Feb; 8(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 7546477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.