376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1344475)
1. [Skin and laboratory tests: comparison of the epicutaneous patch test with the TTL and LIF tests in the diagnosis of medicamentous allergic contact dermatitis].
Jovanović M; Poljacki M; Milakov J; Duran V
Med Pregl; 1992; 45(9-10):365-8. PubMed ID: 1344475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Result of standard patch test in patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis.
Wongpiyabovorn J; Puvabanditsin P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88 Suppl 4():S177-83. PubMed ID: 16623025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Allergic contact dermatitis from doxepin cream. One-year patch test clinic experience.
Taylor JS; Praditsuwan P; Handel D; Kuffner G
Arch Dermatol; 1996 May; 132(5):515-8. PubMed ID: 8624147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Allergic skin disease: investigation of both immediate- and delayed-type hypersensitivity is essential.
Usmani N; Wilkinson SM
Clin Exp Allergy; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1541-6. PubMed ID: 17883733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact allergy in chronic eczematous lip dermatitis.
Schena D; Fantuzzi F; Girolomoni G
Eur J Dermatol; 2008; 18(6):688-92. PubMed ID: 18955202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000.
Wetter DA; Davis MD; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; Connolly SM; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 53(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 16112346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medicament contact allergy.
Edman B; Möller H
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1986; 34(5):139-43. PubMed ID: 2947793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
Soni BP; Sherertz EF
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contact allergy to colophony. Clinical and experimental studies with emphasis on clinical relevance.
Färm G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1998; 201():1-42. PubMed ID: 9833065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Allergic contact dermatitis due to corticosteroids: a 3-year retrospective study in a hospital skin allergy unit].
Pérez-Crespo M; Silvestre JF; Lucas A; Mataix J; Ballester I
Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2009 May; 100(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 19463232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Leg ulcers. Allergologic studies of 359 cases].
Reichert-Pénétrat S; Barbaud A; Weber M; Schmutz JL
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1999 Feb; 126(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 10352827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Allergic contact dermatitis in 136 children patch tested between 2000 and 2006.
Hammonds LM; Hall VC; Yiannias JA
Int J Dermatol; 2009 Mar; 48(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 19261015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective survey of patch testing at department of dermatology and venerology, zagreb university hospital center in zagreb, croatia.
Marinović-Kulisić S; Lipozencić J; Ljubojević S; Milavec-Puretić V
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2004; 12(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 15588559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Excited skin syndrome: study of 39 patients.
Duarte I; Lazzarini R; Bedrikow R
Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Jun; 13(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 12022121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
