These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1345041)

  • 21. Clinical performance of posterior composite resin restorations.
    Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Gordon GE; Powell LV
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Oct; 23(10):705-11. PubMed ID: 1289954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations.
    Palaniappan S; Elsen L; Lijnen I; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Aug; 14(4):441-58. PubMed ID: 19669176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical wear rate of direct and indirect posterior composite resin restorations.
    Cetin AR; Unlu N
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Jun; 32(3):e87-94. PubMed ID: 22408783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Wear of composite resin restorations in primary versus permanent molar teeth.
    Wendell JJ; Vann WF
    J Dent Res; 1988 Jan; 67(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 11039049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluations of composite resin restorations in primary molars: a 4-year follow-up study.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):603-6. PubMed ID: 3225375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Five-year clinical study of u.v.-polymerized posterior composites.
    Wilder AD; Bayne SC; May KN; Leinfelder KF; Taylor DF
    J Dent; 1991 Aug; 19(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 1787209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-year clinical evaluation of a self-cured posterior composite resin.
    Brunson WD; Bayne SC; Shurdevant JR; Roberson TM; Wilder AD; Taylor DF
    Dent Mater; 1989 Mar; 5(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 2691302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical evaluation of a composite resin system with a dentin bonding agent for restoration of permanent posterior teeth: a 3-year study.
    Roberts MW; Folio J; Moffa JP; Guckes AD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 1507089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 7803009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth.
    Manhart J; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11005901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Studies on posterior composite resins with special reference to class II restorations.
    Lundin SA
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 73():1-41. PubMed ID: 2264013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation.
    Pallesen U; Qvist V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Jun; 7(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 12740693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: in vivo wear.
    Willems G; Lambrechts P; Braem M; Vanherle G
    J Dent; 1993 Apr; 21(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 8473595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A clinical trial of four light-curing posterior composite resins: two-year report.
    Dietschi D; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Dec; 21(12):965-75. PubMed ID: 2082424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A clinical evaluation of Class II composites placed using a decoupling technique.
    Wilson NH; Cowan AJ; Unterbrink G; Wilson MA; Crisp RJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 11317379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intraoral wear of PICN CAD-CAM composite restorations used in severe tooth wear treatment: 5-year results of a prospective clinical study using 3D profilometry.
    Oudkerk J; Herman R; Eldafrawy M; Wulfman C; Ernst M; Vanheusden A; Mainjot A
    Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 38762399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical performance and wear resistance of two compomers in posterior occlusal restorations of permanent teeth: six-year follow-up.
    Lund RG; Sehn FP; Piva E; Detoni D; Moura FR; Cardoso PE; Demarco FF
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17427819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.
    Karaman E; Keskin B; Inan U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27538739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.