These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1345707)

  • 1. [Prosthesis used in the surgery of the abdominal wall. Focus on a comparative experimental protocol: difficulties and limits].
    Verhaeghe P; Soler M; Essomba A; Stoppa R
    Chirurgie; 1992; 118(10):700-2. PubMed ID: 1345707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Experimental study of resistance to and biologic tolerance of prosthetic materials used in the repair of losses of substance of the abdominal wall].
    Adloff M; Arnaud JP
    Chirurgie; 1976 Jun; 102(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 133791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of prosthetic materials for abdominal wall reconstruction. Experimental study].
    Hernández-Siverio N; Gomez Culebras MA; Mendez Medina RL; Robayna Duque G; Díaz Flores L; González Hermoso F; Bento Bravo L
    Cir Pediatr; 1993 Jan; 6(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 8388704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interposition of polyglactin mesh does not prevent adhesion formation between viscera and polypropylene mesh.
    de Vries Reilingh TS; van Goor H; Koppe MJ; Bodegom ME; Hendriks T; Bleichrodt RP
    J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17481981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall.
    Klinge U; Klosterhalfen B; Conze J; Limberg W; Obolenski B; Ottinger AP; Schumpelick V
    Eur J Surg; 1998 Dec; 164(12):951-60. PubMed ID: 10029391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Experimental testing of Dexon, Vicryl and Gore-Tex mesh used to complete the abdominal wall].
    Kateusz J; Misterka S; Staniszewska-Kuś J
    Polim Med; 1994; 24(3-4):3-39. PubMed ID: 7899175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosthetic materials and wound healing. Critical evaluation of six different materials.
    Arnaud JP; Eloy R; Adloff M; Grenier JF
    Int Surg; 1978 Jan; 63(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 146683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental evaluation of a new composite mesh with the selective property of incorporation to the abdominal wall without adhering to the intestines.
    Amid PK; Shulman AG; Lichtenstein IL; Sostrin S; Young J; Hakakha M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Mar; 28(3):373-5. PubMed ID: 8077252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repair of abdominal wall defects: Gore-Tex vs. Marlex graft.
    Sher W; Pollack D; Paulides CA; Matsumoto T
    Am Surg; 1980 Nov; 46(11):618-23. PubMed ID: 6449167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Tutoplast-Dura and Zenoderm-Corium implant--materials for tissue replacement. Experimental studies].
    Bagłaj SM; Wytrychowski K; Staniszewska-Kuś J
    Polim Med; 1992; 22(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 1461832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The use of mesh in abdominal wall defects].
    Cappelletti M; Attolini G; Cangioni G; Mascherini G; Taddeucci S; Gervino L
    Minerva Chir; 1997 Oct; 52(10):1169-76. PubMed ID: 9471567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of polypropylene mesh, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch and polyglycolic acid mesh for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects.
    Law NW
    Acta Chir Scand; 1990; 156(11-12):759-62. PubMed ID: 1963726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch versus polypropylene mesh for the repair of contaminated defects of the abdominal wall.
    Bleichrodt RP; Simmermacher RK; van der Lei B; Schakenraad JM
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jan; 176(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 8427001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Meshed implants of polyvinylidene fluoride in treatment of abdominal wall hernias].
    Sedov VM; Gostevskoĭ AA; Tarbaev SD; Gorelov AS; Chulkhovin AB; Nuftullina GM; Zhukovskiĭ VA
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 2008; 167(2):16-21. PubMed ID: 18522179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of prosthesis in abdominal and thoracic wall defect, 15 year experience: evaluation of tissue reactions and complications.
    Francioni G; Ansaldo V; Magistrelli P; Pari AM; Rinaldi P; Sani C; Rafaeli W; Pari G
    Chir Ital; 1999; 51(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10514913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimentally contaminated reabsorbable meshes: their evolution in abdominal wall defects.
    López Villalta GC; Furió-Bacete V; Ortiz Oshiro E; López DO; Vaca Vaticón D; Fdez-Represa JA
    Int Surg; 1995; 80(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 8775607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morphologic study of small intestinal submucosa as a body wall repair device.
    Badylak S; Kokini K; Tullius B; Simmons-Byrd A; Morff R
    J Surg Res; 2002 Apr; 103(2):190-202. PubMed ID: 11922734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Perspectives in the advancement of abdominal wall repair using e synthetic prosthesis].
    Lukomskiĭ GI; Shulutko AM; Antropova NV
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1994 May; (5):53-4. PubMed ID: 8057625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal prosthesis for acute replacement of the abdominal wall.
    Schein M
    J Trauma; 2000 Feb; 48(2):363-4. PubMed ID: 10697111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevention of adhesion formations following repair of abdominal wall defects with prosthetic materials (an experimental study).
    Alimoglu O; Akcakaya A; Sahin M; Unlu Y; Ozkan OV; Sanli E; Eryilmaz R
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(51):725-8. PubMed ID: 12828071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.