These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13458317)
21. The relationship between critical flicker frequency and chronologic age for varying levels of stimulus brightness. COPPINGER NW J Gerontol; 1955 Jan; 10(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 14354181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Simple reaction time to light stimuli during voluntary apnea]. FERRONI A; GIULIO L Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1956 Jun; 32(6):502-3. PubMed ID: 13374144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Duration of after-image after application of luminous stimuli of various ranges of brightness, degree, positions in space and duration of exposure]. ROSLAVTSEV AV Probl Fizol Opt; 1955; 11():145-55. PubMed ID: 13350223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Campimetric determination of the critical fusion frequency of luminous stimuli. I. Apparatus, technic and behavior of campimetric critical fusion frequency in normal subjects]. GRIGNOLO A; BOLES-CARENINI B Boll Ocul; 1954 Apr; 33(4):193-222. PubMed ID: 13189995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of varying stimulus conditions on the flicker-fusion threshold when nitroglycerin or the cold pressor test was employed. LANDIS C; CLAUSEN J; GJESVIK A J Appl Physiol; 1955 Mar; 7(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 14367238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A stereoscopic method for the removal of radio-opaque foreign bodies, especially of intraorbital and intra-ocular localisation. JENSEN VA; RATJEN E Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1961; 39():578-87. PubMed ID: 14451681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Research on the localization error in tachistoscopic perception]. FUMAI G Rass Med Ind Ig Lav; 1956; 25(5):382-98. PubMed ID: 13379696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Study of campimetric determination of the critical frequency of fusion of light stimuli. II. Factors influencing the critical frequency of campimetric fusion]. GRIGNOLO A; BOLES-CARENINI B Boll Ocul; 1954 May; 33(5):257-69. PubMed ID: 13189998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Apropos of the recovery and inhibition of contralateral psychic vision in the hemidecrebrate bird]. PATAY R; DANON-TAZARTEZ G C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci; 1959 Oct; 249():1395-6. PubMed ID: 14430809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Studies on the occipital lobe; significance of small areas of preserved central vision. AUSTIN GM; LEWEY FH; GRANT FC Arch Neurol Psychiatry; 1949 Aug; 62(2):204-21. PubMed ID: 18134213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Localization of centers of visual analyzers in frog]. ZAGORUL'KO TM Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1957 Dec; 43(12):1156-65. PubMed ID: 13524287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Localization of intra-ocular foreign bodies by transpupillary diaphanoscopy]. LEOPOLD P Ann Ocul (Paris); 1959 Nov; 192():863-7. PubMed ID: 14415849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Demonstration and localization of ocular foreign bodies. HOWSAM KG; SMITH JH J Coll Radiol Australas; 1963 Jun; 7():113-6. PubMed ID: 13955199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [The hole method for changing the spatial localization in the treatment of amblyopia with eccentric fixation]. THOMAS C Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1959 Nov; 8():717-9. PubMed ID: 13837925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [METHODS OF EXAMINATION AND LOCALIZATION OF INTRA-OCULAR FOREIGN BODIES]. CORTE-REAL M; MOUTINHO H J Soc Cienc Med Lisb; 1963 Apr; 42():SUPPL 1:94-109. PubMed ID: 14115888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Relation of the absolute visual threshold to the gradient of a stimulus shorter than "active" period]. KROL' TM Biofizika; 1960; 5():685-90. PubMed ID: 13831082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The dependence of binocular fusion on timing of peripheral stimuli and on central process; 3. Cortical Flicker. BAKER CH Can J Psychol; 1952 Dec; 6(4):151-63; concl. PubMed ID: 13019672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The magnitude of binocular summation as a function of the method of stimulus presentation. COLLIER G; KUBZANSKY P J Exp Psychol; 1958 Oct; 56(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 13587867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Certain factors influencing resorption from the subcutaneous layers]. HAVA M; MRAZ M Cesk Fysiol; 1959 Apr; 8(3):193-4. PubMed ID: 13671530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]