244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1347810)
1. Does infection occur with modern intrauterine devices?
Lancet; 1992 Mar; 339(8796):783-4. PubMed ID: 1347810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective.
Farley TM; Rosenberg MJ; Rowe PJ; Chen JH; Meirik O
Lancet; 1992 Mar; 339(8796):785-8. PubMed ID: 1347812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Today's IUDs offer safe, effective contraception.
Finger WR
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1993 Mar; 13(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 12318094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrauterine contraceptive device and pelvic inflammatory disease.
Toivonen J
Ann Med; 1993 Apr; 25(2):171-3. PubMed ID: 8489756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current status of intrauterine devices. II. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy.
Malhotra N; Chaudhury RR
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1982 Jan; 37(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7054735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IUDs and PID: understanding the American situation.
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1987; 8(2):8. PubMed ID: 12268660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The intrauterine device, pelvic inflammatory disease, and infertility: the confusion between hypothesis and knowledge.
Grimes DA
Fertil Steril; 1992 Oct; 58(4):670-3. PubMed ID: 1426307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings.
Mumford SD; Kessel E
Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1151-76. PubMed ID: 1601137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pelvic actinomycosis and usage of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Kelly J; Aaron J
Yale J Biol Med; 1982; 55(5-6):453-61. PubMed ID: 7183022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Earth, motherhood, and the intrauterine device.
Eschenbach DA
Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1177-9. PubMed ID: 1601138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Contraception and pelvic infection in women].
Keith L; Berger GS; Brown ER
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1986 Jan; 14(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12341241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pelvic inflammatory disease and the intrauterine contraceptive device.
Wright EA; Aisien AO
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Feb; 28(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2563699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: recent developments.
Grimes DA
Contraception; 1987 Jul; 36(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 3311628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconsidering IUDs.
Goldberg B
AVSC News; 1992 Jul; 30(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 12285571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The intrauterine device in the present and future.
Rivera R; Chi IC; Farr G
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 5(6):829-32. PubMed ID: 8286697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pelvic inflammatory disease with intrauterine device use: a reassessment.
Kessel E
Fertil Steril; 1989 Jan; 51(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2642807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appropriate follow up to detect potential adverse events after initiation of select contraceptive methods: a systematic review.
Steenland MW; Zapata LB; Brahmi D; Marchbanks PA; Curtis KM
Contraception; 2013 May; 87(5):611-24. PubMed ID: 23177264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing.
Finger WR; Barr D
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease.
McCarthy T; Roy AC; Ratnam SS
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 May; 24(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 6388551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
