These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 134799)

  • 1. [Effect of frequency on the loudness of short sounds: comparison between 2 near frequencies, 500 and 1000 Hz].
    Cavé C; Chocholle R
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1976; 170(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 134799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Variations in the loudness of a brief sound compared to another brief sound as a function of the duration of both sounds].
    Szymanski L; Chocholle R
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1976 Oct; 170(3):558-62. PubMed ID: 135614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Relationship between evaluation of the duration and loudness of short sounds].
    Szymanski L; Chocholle R
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1976 Oct; 170(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 135616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effects of duration on the equal loudness contours of short and brief tones: 40 phones equal loudness contours. Preliminary experiments (author's transl)].
    Chocholle R; Saulnier C
    Audiology; 1976; 15(3):196-206. PubMed ID: 938333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Variations of the loudness of a brief tone (20 ms) as a function of the rise and decay times at 1000 Hz].
    Chocholle R; Saulnier C
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1977; 171(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 142546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency-dependent changes in absolute hearing threshold caused by perception of a previous sound.
    Yoshida J; Hasegawa H; Kasuga M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL62. PubMed ID: 17927309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loudness adaptation measured by the simultaneous dichotic loudness balance technique differs between genders.
    D'Alessandro LM; Norwich KH
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19027058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing at low and infrasonic frequencies.
    Møller H; Pedersen CS
    Noise Health; 2004; 6(23):37-57. PubMed ID: 15273023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cortical responses to the 2f1-f2 combination tone measured indirectly using magnetoencephalography.
    Purcell DW; Ross B; Picton TW; Pantev C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):992-1003. PubMed ID: 17672647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dependency of threshold and loudness on sound duration at low and infrasonic frequencies.
    Jurado C; Larrea M; Patel H; Marquardt T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):1030. PubMed ID: 32872982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An introduction to induced loudness reduction.
    Epstein M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL74. PubMed ID: 17927311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Maki A; Kawase T; Kobayashi T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 19550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to sounds presented at different rates in anesthetized albino mouse.
    Bibikov NG; Chen QC; Wu FJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Jul; 241(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 18539419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensory unpleasantness of very-high frequency sound and audible ultrasound.
    Lineton B; Al Balushi RAR; Jones SL; Leighton TG; Fletcher MD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Sep; 156(3):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 39240123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing- and decreasing-loudness aftereffects: asymmetrical functions for absolute rate of sound level change in adapting stimulus.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1995 Apr; 122(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 7790848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why can a decrease in dB(A) produce an increase in loudness?
    Hellman R; Zwicker E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1700-5. PubMed ID: 3693710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Loudness of tone pulses in a free field.
    Poulsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jun; 69(6):1786-90. PubMed ID: 7240592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions between test- and inducer-tone durations in induced loudness reduction.
    Nieder B; Buus S; Florentine M; Scharf B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Nov; 114(5):2846-55. PubMed ID: 14650019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dependence of loudness growth on skirts of excitation patterns.
    Hellman RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Apr; 63(4):1114-9. PubMed ID: 649870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.