These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13492332)

  • 1. Noise bands vs. pure tones as stimuli for audiometry.
    MYERS CK
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1957 Dec; 22(5):757-60. PubMed ID: 13492332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reference equivalent threshold levels for pure tones and 1/3-oct noise bands: insert earphone and TDH-49 earphone.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 3950196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PURE tone audiometry; technique for determining thresholds of hearing for pure tones.
    J Laryngol Otol; 1952 Aug; 66(8):415-16. PubMed ID: 14955674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of level and background noise on interaural time difference discrimination for transposed stimuli.
    Dreyer AA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):EL1-7. PubMed ID: 18177063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Noise audiometry: findings at the hearing threshold in rustling noise].
    FIORI-RATTI L
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1951 Dec; 3(6):428-32. PubMed ID: 14926108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [STUDY OF THE PROSTHESIS GAIN IN DEAF-MUTES ON PURE TONES IN A FREE FIELD].
    CIGES M; MENCHETA E; LOPEZ R
    Acta Otorinolaryngol Iber Am; 1964; 15():111-23. PubMed ID: 14169391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [DATA TO THE PROBLEM OF DEAFNESS DUE TO NOISE. (COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOUND AND SPEECH AUDIOMETRY)].
    VOJACEK E; DOUBEK F
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1964 Aug; 98():329-45. PubMed ID: 14249534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Noise-audiometric hearing tests of locomotive conductors].
    KOCH H; LIDEN G
    Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel); 1956 May; 18(3):159-70. PubMed ID: 13335628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. BONE CONDUCTION AND NOISE MASKING.
    WESTON PB
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1965; ():SUPPL 204:1+. PubMed ID: 14310789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [GENERAL PROBLEMS OCCURRING IN THE QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF TRAUMATIC HEARING DISORDERS].
    FELDMANN H
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1963; 97():497-501. PubMed ID: 14131529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for computerized classification of pure tone screening audiometry results in noise-exposed groups.
    Klockhoff I; Drettner B; Hagelin KW; Lindholm L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1973 Apr; 75(4):339-40. PubMed ID: 4702637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Noise audiometry in expertise].
    LANGENBECK B
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1951 Dec; 30(12):572-4. PubMed ID: 13079019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Occupational deafness: comparative study of routine audiometry and of simplified audiometric tests].
    VYNCKIER H; MASUREEL A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1961; 15():570-3. PubMed ID: 13927001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical evaluation of noise audiometry.
    PALVA T; GOODMAN A; HIRSH IJ
    Laryngoscope; 1953 Sep; 63(9):842-60. PubMed ID: 13098190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Basic principles of noise audiometry].
    HUIZING HC
    Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel); 1952; 14(6):360-6. PubMed ID: 13047121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF TURBINE NOISES IN DENTAL PRACTICE ON HEARING].
    KELLER J; OLK E; OPITZ J
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1964 Nov; 43():680-90. PubMed ID: 14334529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of discomfort levels obtained with pure tones and multitone complexes.
    Bentler RA; Pavlovic CV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jul; 86(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 2754105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF HEARING AND NOISE EXPOSURE IN TEXTILE WORKERS.
    BURNS W; HINCHCLIFFE R; LITTLER TS
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1964 Dec; 7():323-33. PubMed ID: 14266235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.