These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13492332)

  • 41. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The influence of audiometric configuration on pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing losses.
    Stephens MM; Rintelmann WF
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 659294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [ON CONSTRUCTION OF SOUNDPROOF CHAMBERS].
    BORSHCHEVSKII IIa; KUZNETSOV VS
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1964; 26():25-9. PubMed ID: 14149497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Equivalence and test-retest reproducibility of conventional and extended-high-frequency audiometric thresholds obtained using pure-tone and narrow-band-noise stimuli.
    John AB; Kreisman BM
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Sep; 56(9):635-642. PubMed ID: 28388868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Narrow band noise audiometry: the effect of filter slope.
    Orchik DJ; Mosher NL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 1232074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Hearing acuity and exposure to patrol aircraft noise.
    Pierson WR; Barron CI
    Aerosp Med; 1969 Oct; 40(10):1099-101. PubMed ID: 5348735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Speech discrimination in noise.
    Cooper JC; Cutts BP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):332-7. PubMed ID: 5558087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Early components of the averaged electroencephalic response in relation to rise-decay time and duration of pure tones.
    Lane RH; Kupperman GL; Goldstein R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):408-15. PubMed ID: 5558097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Environmental noise, hearing acuity, and acceptance criteria.
    Hermann ER
    Arch Environ Health; 1969 May; 18(5):784-91. PubMed ID: 5781924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Suggested threshold sound pressure levels for frequency-modulated (warble) tones in the sound field.
    Morgan DE; Dirks DD; Bower DR
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1979 Feb; 44(1):37-54. PubMed ID: 423554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effective identification of functional hearing loss using behavioral threshold measures.
    Schlauch RS; Koerner TK; Marshall L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):453-65. PubMed ID: 25421175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Response of infants and young children as a function of auditory stimuli and test methods.
    Thompson M; Thompson G
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Dec; 15(4):699-707. PubMed ID: 4652388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sound attenuation of TDH-39 earphones in a diffuse field of narrow-band noise.
    Arlinger SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jan; 79(1):189-91. PubMed ID: 3944342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of noise upon the upper frequency limit of hearing.
    Flottorp G
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1973 Apr; 75(4):329-31. PubMed ID: 4702633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Residual effect of a stimulus with complex spectrum (white noise) on the auditory threshold of several fundamental frequencies].
    Pirodda E; Cenacchi V; Segatta D
    Otorinolaringol Ital; 1968; 37(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 5719450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [On the prolonged action of permissable parameters of noise on the hearing of workers].
    Maksimova LI; Kublanova PS; Maĭorov VP; Dmitrieva KA
    Gig Sanit; 1966 Feb; 31(2):11-6. PubMed ID: 5983418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Directional audiometry. IV. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in aided and unaided patients with monaural hearing loss.
    Tonning FM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1972 Jan; 73(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 5061256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Directional hearing and understanding of speech in noise uith "normal hearing" people (author's transl)].
    Platte HJ; Döring WH; Schlöndorff G
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Jul; 57(7):672-80. PubMed ID: 682785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A MOBILE UNIT FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF HEARING.
    TAYLOR W; BURNS W; MAIR A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1964 Dec; 7():343-52. PubMed ID: 14266237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A STAGGERED SPONDAIC WORD TEST FOR DETECTING CENTRAL AUDITORY LESIONS.
    KATZ J; BASIL RA; SMITH JM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1963 Dec; 72():908-17. PubMed ID: 14088732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.