BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1349457)

  • 1. The debate on treating individuals incompetent for execution.
    Heilbrun K; Radelet ML; Dvoskin J
    Am J Psychiatry; 1992 May; 149(5):596-605. PubMed ID: 1349457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment cases : a review].
    Nakajima N
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 11985117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treating those found incompetent for execution: ethical chaos with only one solution.
    Radelet ML; Barnard GW
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(4):297-308. PubMed ID: 3233347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. State can make inmate sane enough to execute.
    Liptak A
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Feb; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 12812158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy.
    Latzer B
    Crim Justice Ethics; 2003; 22(2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15080128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treating the condemned to death.
    Sargent DA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec; 16(6):5-6. PubMed ID: 3804727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treating criminal offenders in correctional contexts: identifying interests and distributing responsibilities.
    Schopp RF
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):833-55. PubMed ID: 19784945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception.
    Coverdale JH; Bayer TL; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1993 Jul; 44(7):671-4. PubMed ID: 8354506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perry v. Louisiana: can a state treat an incompetent prisoner to ready him for execution?
    Evans GL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(3):249-70. PubMed ID: 1777688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Justices let stand ruling that allows forcibly drugging an inmate before execution.
    Lewis NA
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A16. PubMed ID: 14610765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Competency for execution.
    Aquila R
    Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Apr; 150(4):677; author reply 678. PubMed ID: 8465899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward a pure best interests model of proxy decision making for incompetent psychiatric patients.
    McCubbin M; Weisstub DN
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 9526712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Autonomy and beneficence: ethical issues in electroconvulsive therapy.
    Reiter-Theil S
    Convuls Ther; 1992 Dec; 8(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 11659608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The need to commute the death sentence: competency for execution and ethical dilemmas for mental health professionals.
    Wallace DH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(3):317-37. PubMed ID: 1399188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of competency for execution? A guide for mental health professionals.
    Heilbrun KS; McClaren HA
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(3):205-16. PubMed ID: 3179499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
    Cantor JD
    Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perry v. Louisiana: medical ethics on death row--is judicial intervention warranted?
    Katz DL
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(3):707-29. PubMed ID: 12186078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Therapeutic issues associated with confidentiality and informed consent in forensic evaluations.
    Yates KF
    N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1994; 20(2):345-68. PubMed ID: 11659983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restored to health to be put to death: reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris.
    Hensl KB
    Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):291-328. PubMed ID: 16485377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sell v. United States: the appropriate standard for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to dangerous detainees for trial.
    Borger BA
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2005; 35(3):1099-120. PubMed ID: 16270457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.