These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection. Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is the statistical assessment of papers submitted to the "British Medical Journal" effective? Gardner MJ; Altman DG; Jones DR; Machin D Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 May; 286(6376):1485-8. PubMed ID: 6405855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR. Chew FS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):627-32. PubMed ID: 1899764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012. Lamb CR; Mai W Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 24798652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pride and prejudice in peer review. Kemper KJ J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(4-5):343-5. PubMed ID: 2010777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012. Lamb CR; Adams CA Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Kilkenny C; Browne WJ; Cuthill IC; Emerson M; Altman DG Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2012 Apr; 20(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 22424462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Kilkenny C; Browne WJ; Cuthi I; Emerson M; Altman DG Vet Clin Pathol; 2012 Mar; 41(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 22390425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A new template for referees and guidance on writing high quality papers. Goodsitt MM; Das SK; Williamson JF Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4465. PubMed ID: 27487861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The fate of abstracts presented at annual meetings of the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland from 1993 to 2007. Drury NE; Maniakis-Grivas G; Rogers VJ; Williams LK; Pagano D; Martin-Ucar AE Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Nov; 42(5):885-9. PubMed ID: 22466698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of statistics in the British Journal of Psychiatry. McGuigan SM Br J Psychiatry; 1995 Nov; 167(5):683-8. PubMed ID: 8564329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [A guide to the peer review of scientific papers]. Giunta RE; Prommersberger KJ Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2012 Aug; 44(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 22836956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Writing the methods. Coverdale J; Roberts L; Louie A; Beresin E Acad Psychiatry; 2006; 30(5):361-4. PubMed ID: 17021142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A two-step manuscript submission process can reduce publication bias. Smulders YM J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):946-7. PubMed ID: 23845183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]