These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13526486)

  • 21. Challenges with up-scaling dry sanitation technologies.
    Bhagwan JN; Still D; Buckley C; Foxon K
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 18653932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of community led total sanitation and hygiene approach on improvement of latrine utilization in Laelay Maichew District, North Ethiopia. A comparative cross-sectional study.
    Gebremariam B; Hagos G; Abay M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203458. PubMed ID: 30192803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Cross Sectional Study of the Association between Sanitation Type and Fecal Contamination of the Household Environment in Rural Bangladesh.
    Huda TMN; Schmidt WP; Pickering AJ; Mahmud ZH; Islam MS; Rahman MS; Luby SP; Biran A
    Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2018 Apr; 98(4):967-976. PubMed ID: 29436345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pit latrine fill-up rates: variation determinants and public health implications in informal settlements, Nakuru-Kenya.
    Gudda FO; Moturi WN; Oduor OS; Muchiri EW; Ensink J
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):68. PubMed ID: 30646871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A 'new latrine' suitable for rural communities, camps and isolated bungalows.
    LAL RB
    Ind Med Gaz; 1950 Oct; 85(10):469-73. PubMed ID: 14794210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The complementary effect of latrines and increased water usage on the growth of infants in rural Lesotho.
    Esrey SA; Habicht JP; Casella G
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Mar; 135(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 1580242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is there a difference in prevalence of helminths between households using ecological sanitation and those using traditional pit latrines? A latrine based cross sectional comparative study in Malawi.
    Kumwenda S; Msefula C; Kadewa W; Diness Y; Kato C; Morse T; Ngwira B
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jun; 10(1):200. PubMed ID: 28599671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fecal indicator and Ascaris removal from double pit latrine content.
    Dey D; Ridwanul Haque AT; Kabir B; Ubaid SF
    J Water Health; 2016 Dec; 14(6):972-979. PubMed ID: 27959875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is Using a Latrine "A Strange Thing To Do"? A Mixed-Methods Study of Sanitation Preference and Behaviors in Rural Ethiopia.
    Aiemjoy K; Stoller NE; Gebresillasie S; Shiferaw A; Tadesse Z; Sewent T; Ayele B; Chanyalew M; Aragie S; Callahan K; Stewart A; Emerson PM; Lietman TM; Keenan JD; Oldenburg CE
    Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2017 Jan; 96(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 28077741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A cluster-randomized multi-level intervention to increase latrine use and safe disposal of child feces in rural Odisha, India: the Sundara Grama research protocol.
    Caruso BA; Sclar GD; Routray P; Majorin F; Nagel C; Clasen T
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Mar; 19(1):322. PubMed ID: 30885158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Women's role in sanitation decision making in rural coastal Odisha, India.
    Routray P; Torondel B; Clasen T; Schmidt WP
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178042. PubMed ID: 28542525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Shared latrines in Maputo, Mozambique: exploring emotional well-being and psychosocial stress.
    Shiras T; Cumming O; Brown J; Muneme B; Nala R; Dreibelbis R
    BMC Int Health Hum Rights; 2018 Jul; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 30045729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of a community intervention with pit latrines in five districts of Amhara, Ethiopia.
    Ngondi J; Teferi T; Gebre T; Shargie EB; Zerihun M; Ayele B; Adamu L; King JD; Cromwell EA; Emerson PM
    Trop Med Int Health; 2010 May; 15(5):592-9. PubMed ID: 20345557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Supply and Demand for Improved Sanitation: Results from Randomized Pricing Experiments in Rural Tanzania.
    Peletz R; Cock-Esteb A; Ysenburg D; Haji S; Khush R; Dupas P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Jun; 51(12):7138-7147. PubMed ID: 28562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is Community-Led Total Sanitation connected to the rebuilding of latrines? Quantitative evidence from Mozambique.
    Mosler HJ; Mosch S; Harter M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197483. PubMed ID: 29787594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How does Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) affect latrine ownership? A quantitative case study from Mozambique.
    Harter M; Mosch S; Mosler HJ
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Mar; 18(1):387. PubMed ID: 29562899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Household sanitation in Uasin Gishu district in Kenya.
    Some ES
    East Afr Med J; 1992 Nov; 69(11):611-2. PubMed ID: 1298615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of respondent-reported and sensor-recorded latrine utilization measures in rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.
    Delea MG; Nagel CL; Thomas EA; Halder AK; Amin N; Shoab AK; Freeman MC; Unicomb L; Clasen TF
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2017 Jul; 111(7):308-315. PubMed ID: 29126213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Making sanitation count: developing and testing a device for assessing latrine use in low-income settings.
    Clasen T; Fabini D; Boisson S; Taneja J; Song J; Aichinger E; Bui A; Dadashi S; Schmidt WP; Burt Z; Nelson KL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3295-303. PubMed ID: 22321123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Volta watertight VIP latrine.
    Dadie-Amoah K; Komba S
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 2000; 105():361-5. PubMed ID: 10842839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.